Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Highly Porous Acetabular Cup and Augment Constructs in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Predicts 10 Year Implant Survivorship?

BACKGROUND: Porous tantalum acetabular cup and augment constructs have demonstrated favorable outcomes up to five years post-surgery despite severe bone loss during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior literature lacks long-term studies with substantial case numbers. This study aims to assess long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes 10 years post-surgery in patients undergoing revision THA with porous tantalum acetabular cup-augment constructs and determine factors associated with long-term survivorship.

METHODS: Between 2000 and 2012, 157 revision THAs were performed in cases with major acetabular defects (mainly Paprosky Type IIIA and IIIB) utilizing porous tantalum cup-augment constructs. Pelvic discontinuity was noted intraoperatively in 17 hips (11%). Postoperative radiographs were evaluated at regular intervals for implant stability and radiolucent lines. There were 49 patients who had complete radiographic follow-up at 10 years or longer post-surgery.

RESULTS: The 10-year survivorship free of revision of the cup-augment construct for aseptic loosening was 93%, free of any acetabular construct revision was 91%, free of any hip re-revision was 77%, and free of any reoperation was 75%. Pelvic discontinuity was associated with increased risk of reoperation (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 2.8), any hip re-revision (HR = 3.2), any cup-augment construct revision (HR = 11.8), and aseptic construct revision (HR = 10.0). Of unrevised cases with radiographs at 10 years, four hips showed radiographic loosening. Mean Harris Hip Scores improved from 47 preoperatively to 79 at 10-years.

CONCLUSIONS: Porous tantalum acetabular cup-augment constructs used in revision THA with severe acetabular bone loss provide excellent implant survivorship at 10 years when the acetabulum is intact. Due to lower survivorship of cup-augment constructs in cases of pelvic discontinuity, additional construct fixation or stabilization methods are recommended. when a discontinuity is present.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app