Stresses in Premolars Restored Using Different Post-and-Core and Crown Materials: An FEA Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of three post-and-core systems and two crown materials on stresses in restored premolars using Finite Element Analysis (FEA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary second premolar 3D model was created in SolidWorks 2014 (Dassault Systémés). Severe loss of tooth structure was simulated with six restorative options: 1) glass-fiber-reinforced composite post and composite core (GFRC)+CAD/CAM leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crown (LRC); 2) carbon-fiberreinforced composite post and composite core (CFRC)+LRC; 3) metal cast post-and-core (MPC)+LRC 4) GFRC+CAD/CAM composite resin crown (CC); 5) CFRC+CC; 6) MPC+CC. Three-point occlusal loading (150N) was simulated and von Misses and maximum principal stresses calculated.

RESULTS: Although maximum von Mises stresses in the crown and dentin were similar across groups (137.9-139.2MPa crown; 17.2-19.6 dentin), there were important differences in stress distribution in dentin. Only in MPC+CC group the maximum stresses were on the bottom of the post preparation cavity. Stress values within the posts were: CFRC(4.8MPa)>GFRC(6.7MPa)>MPC(10.3MPa). CC-restored models presented higher von Mises stresses within the post-and-core compared to the LRC groups. Maximum principal stresses were lower compared to von Mises stresses, following the same trend, and were distributed similarly in all the groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Both GFRC and CFRC showed favourable stresses distribution in the dentin and restorative materials, while MPC increased stresses in core, post and post cement. The more rigid crown material seems to transmit less stresses to the underlying core and crown cement compared to CC.