We have located links that may give you full text access.
Erector Spinae Blocks for opioid-sparing multimodal pain management after Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2024 March 16
OBJECTIVE: Peripheral regional anesthesia is proposed to enhance recovery. We sought to evaluate: the efficacy of bilateral continuous erector spinae plane blocks (B-ESpB) for postoperative analgesia and the impact on recovery in children undergoing cardiac surgery.
METHODS: Patients ages 2 through 17 years undergoing cardiac surgery in the enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERAS) program were prospectively enrolled to receive B-ESpB at the end of the procedure, with continuous infusions via catheters postoperatively. Participants wore an activity monitor until discharge. B-ESpB patients were retrospectively matched with control patients in the ERAS program. Outcomes of the matched clusters were compared using exact conditional logistic regression and generalized linear modeling.
RESULTS: Forty (40) patients receiving BESB were matched to 78 controls. There were no major complications from the B-ESpB or infusions, and operating room time was longer by a median of 31-min. While blocks were infusing, patients with B-ESpB received fewer opioids in oral morphine equivalent (OME) than controls at 24-hrs (0.60±0.06 vs 0.78±0.04 mg/kg, p=0.02) and 48-hrs (1.13±0.08 vs 1.35±0.06 mg/kg, p=0.04), respectively. Both groups had low median pain scores per 12-hrs period. There was no difference in early mobilization, length of stay, and complications.
CONCLUSION: B-ESpB are safe in children undergoing cardiac surgery. When performed as part of a multimodal pain strategy in an ERAS program, pediatric patients with B-ESpB experience good pain control and require fewer opioids in the first 48 hours.
METHODS: Patients ages 2 through 17 years undergoing cardiac surgery in the enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERAS) program were prospectively enrolled to receive B-ESpB at the end of the procedure, with continuous infusions via catheters postoperatively. Participants wore an activity monitor until discharge. B-ESpB patients were retrospectively matched with control patients in the ERAS program. Outcomes of the matched clusters were compared using exact conditional logistic regression and generalized linear modeling.
RESULTS: Forty (40) patients receiving BESB were matched to 78 controls. There were no major complications from the B-ESpB or infusions, and operating room time was longer by a median of 31-min. While blocks were infusing, patients with B-ESpB received fewer opioids in oral morphine equivalent (OME) than controls at 24-hrs (0.60±0.06 vs 0.78±0.04 mg/kg, p=0.02) and 48-hrs (1.13±0.08 vs 1.35±0.06 mg/kg, p=0.04), respectively. Both groups had low median pain scores per 12-hrs period. There was no difference in early mobilization, length of stay, and complications.
CONCLUSION: B-ESpB are safe in children undergoing cardiac surgery. When performed as part of a multimodal pain strategy in an ERAS program, pediatric patients with B-ESpB experience good pain control and require fewer opioids in the first 48 hours.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app