We have located links that may give you full text access.
AI-based automated pre-processing and classification of impacted maxillary canines in panoramic radiographs.
Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 2024 Februrary 20
OBJECTIVES: Automating the digital workflow for diagnosing impacted canines using panoramic radiographs (PRs) is challenging. This study explored feature extraction, automated cropping, and classification of impacted and non-impacted canines as a first step.
METHODS: A convolutional neural network (CNN) with SqueezeNet architecture was first trained to classify two groups of PRs (91with, and 91without impacted canines) on the MATLAB programming platform. Based on results, the need to crop the PRs was realized. Next, artificial intelligence (AI) detectors were trained to identify specific landmarks (maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, canines, bicuspids, nasal area, and the mandibular ramus) on the PRs. Landmarks were then explored to guide cropping of the PRs. Finally, improvements in classification of automatically cropped PRs was studied.
RESULTS: Without cropping, the area under the curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for classifying impacted and non-impacted canine was 84%. Landmark training showed that detectors could correctly identify upper central incisors and the ramus in ∼98% of PRs. The combined use of the mandibular ramus and maxillary central incisors as guides for cropping yielded the best results (∼10% incorrect cropping). When automatically cropped PRs were used, the AUC-ROC improved to 96%.
CONCLUSION: AI algorithms can be automated to pre-process PRs and improve the identification of impacted canines.
METHODS: A convolutional neural network (CNN) with SqueezeNet architecture was first trained to classify two groups of PRs (91with, and 91without impacted canines) on the MATLAB programming platform. Based on results, the need to crop the PRs was realized. Next, artificial intelligence (AI) detectors were trained to identify specific landmarks (maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, canines, bicuspids, nasal area, and the mandibular ramus) on the PRs. Landmarks were then explored to guide cropping of the PRs. Finally, improvements in classification of automatically cropped PRs was studied.
RESULTS: Without cropping, the area under the curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for classifying impacted and non-impacted canine was 84%. Landmark training showed that detectors could correctly identify upper central incisors and the ramus in ∼98% of PRs. The combined use of the mandibular ramus and maxillary central incisors as guides for cropping yielded the best results (∼10% incorrect cropping). When automatically cropped PRs were used, the AUC-ROC improved to 96%.
CONCLUSION: AI algorithms can be automated to pre-process PRs and improve the identification of impacted canines.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app