Journal Article
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Not Available].

OBJECTIVE: To compare short versus long intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric hip fractures in terms of efficacy and safety.

METHODS: We included cohort studies and randomized clinical trials. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.4. Heterogeneity was checked with the I2 test. A fixed effects model was adopted if there was no heterogeneity.

RESULTS: Twelve studies were included. The reoperations rate was lower in the short nail group (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88) and there were no differences regarding the peri-implant fracture rate (OR 1.77, 95% CI 0.68-4.60). Surgery time and blood loss was significantly higher in the long nail group (MD -12.44, 95% CI -14.60 to (-10.28)) (MD -19.36, 95% CI -27.24 to (-11.48)). There were no differences in functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: The long nail showed a higher reoperation rate, blood loss and surgery time compared to the short nail.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app