We have located links that may give you full text access.
Hemostatic effect of fibrinogen concentrate on traumatic massive hemorrhage: a propensity score matching study.
BACKGROUND: Fibrinogen concentrate (FC) can be administered during massive transfusions to manage trauma-induced coagulopathy. However, its effectiveness in survival remains inconclusive due to scarce high-level evidence. This study aimed to investigate the hemostatic effects of FC regarding mortality in massive hemorrhage caused by trauma.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 839 patients who received massive transfusions (red blood cells (RBCs) ≥5 units in 4 hours or ≥10 units in 24 hours) at a level I trauma center between 2015 and 2022. Patients who were transferred to other hospitals or were deceased upon arrival, suffered or died from severe brain injury, and were aged 15 years or less were excluded (n=334). 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to compare the 'FC (+)' group who had received FC in 24 hours (n=68) with those who had not ('FC (-)', n=437). The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes included transfusion volume.
RESULTS: The variables for matching included vital signs, injury characteristics, prehospital time, implementation of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, and blood gas analysis results. The administration of FC did not significantly reduce or predict mortality (in-hospital, 24 hours, 48 hours, or 7 days). The FC (-) group received more units of RBC (25.69 units vs. 16.71 units, p<0.001, standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.595), fresh frozen plasma (16.79 units vs. 12.91 units, p=0.023, SMD 0.321), and platelets (8.76 units vs. 5.46 units, p=0.002, SMD 0.446) than the FC (+) group.
CONCLUSION: The use of FC did not show survival benefits but reduced transfusion requirements in traumatic massive hemorrhages, highlighting a need for future investigations. In the future, individualized goal-directed transfusion with FC may play a significant role in treating massive bleeding.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study having more than one negative criterion.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 839 patients who received massive transfusions (red blood cells (RBCs) ≥5 units in 4 hours or ≥10 units in 24 hours) at a level I trauma center between 2015 and 2022. Patients who were transferred to other hospitals or were deceased upon arrival, suffered or died from severe brain injury, and were aged 15 years or less were excluded (n=334). 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to compare the 'FC (+)' group who had received FC in 24 hours (n=68) with those who had not ('FC (-)', n=437). The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes included transfusion volume.
RESULTS: The variables for matching included vital signs, injury characteristics, prehospital time, implementation of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, and blood gas analysis results. The administration of FC did not significantly reduce or predict mortality (in-hospital, 24 hours, 48 hours, or 7 days). The FC (-) group received more units of RBC (25.69 units vs. 16.71 units, p<0.001, standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.595), fresh frozen plasma (16.79 units vs. 12.91 units, p=0.023, SMD 0.321), and platelets (8.76 units vs. 5.46 units, p=0.002, SMD 0.446) than the FC (+) group.
CONCLUSION: The use of FC did not show survival benefits but reduced transfusion requirements in traumatic massive hemorrhages, highlighting a need for future investigations. In the future, individualized goal-directed transfusion with FC may play a significant role in treating massive bleeding.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study having more than one negative criterion.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app