We have located links that may give you full text access.
Near-to-patient-testing to inform targeted antibiotic use for sexually transmitted infections in a public sexual health clinic: the NEPTUNE cohort study.
The Lancet Regional Health. Western Pacific. 2024 March
BACKGROUND: Empiric treatment of sexually transmitted infections can cause unnecessary antibiotic use. We determined if near-to-patient-testing (NPT) for Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) improved antibiotic-use for a range of clinical presentations.
METHODS: Clients attending with non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU), proctitis, as STI-contacts, or for an MG-test-of-cure (MG-TOC) between March and December 2021 were recruited. Participants received near-to-patient-testing (NPT-group) for the three STIs using the GeneXpert® System (Cepheid), and concurrent routine-testing by transcription-mediated-amplification (TMA; Aptima, Hologic). Antibiotic-use among NGU or proctitis cases in the NPT-group was compared to clinic-controls undergoing routine-testing only. The proportion in the NPT-group who notified partners <24 hrs of their STI-specific result was calculated.
FINDINGS: Among 904 consults by 808 NPT-participants, ≥1 STI was detected in 63/252 (25.0%) with NGU, 22/51 (43.1%) with proctitis, and 167/527 (31.7%) STI-contacts. MG was detected among 35/157 (22.3%) MG-TOC consults. Among NGU and proctitis cases, fewer in the NPT-group received empiric treatment compared to clinic-controls (29.4% [95% CI: 24.3-34.9%] vs 83.8% [95% CI: 79.2-87.8%], p < 0.001), resulting in more NPT-group cases appropriately treated (STI-specific drug/no drug appropriately; 80.9% [95% CI: 76.0-85.1%] vs 33.0% [95% CI: 27.7-38.6%], p < 0.001) and fewer mistreated (incorrect drug/treated but pathogen-negative; 17.8% [13.7-22.6%] vs 61.4% [55.6-66.9%], p < 0.001). Of 167/264 in the NPT-group with an STI who responded regarding partner-notification, 95.2% notified all/some partners; 85.9% notified them <24 hrs of the STI-specific result.
INTERPRETATION: Near-to-patient-testing significantly improved antibiotic use and a high proportion of individuals rapidly notified partners of STI-specific results, highlighting the broad benefits of timely diagnostic strategies for STIs in clinical decision making and partner notification.
FUNDING: ARC ITRP Hub-grant; NHMRC.
METHODS: Clients attending with non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU), proctitis, as STI-contacts, or for an MG-test-of-cure (MG-TOC) between March and December 2021 were recruited. Participants received near-to-patient-testing (NPT-group) for the three STIs using the GeneXpert® System (Cepheid), and concurrent routine-testing by transcription-mediated-amplification (TMA; Aptima, Hologic). Antibiotic-use among NGU or proctitis cases in the NPT-group was compared to clinic-controls undergoing routine-testing only. The proportion in the NPT-group who notified partners <24 hrs of their STI-specific result was calculated.
FINDINGS: Among 904 consults by 808 NPT-participants, ≥1 STI was detected in 63/252 (25.0%) with NGU, 22/51 (43.1%) with proctitis, and 167/527 (31.7%) STI-contacts. MG was detected among 35/157 (22.3%) MG-TOC consults. Among NGU and proctitis cases, fewer in the NPT-group received empiric treatment compared to clinic-controls (29.4% [95% CI: 24.3-34.9%] vs 83.8% [95% CI: 79.2-87.8%], p < 0.001), resulting in more NPT-group cases appropriately treated (STI-specific drug/no drug appropriately; 80.9% [95% CI: 76.0-85.1%] vs 33.0% [95% CI: 27.7-38.6%], p < 0.001) and fewer mistreated (incorrect drug/treated but pathogen-negative; 17.8% [13.7-22.6%] vs 61.4% [55.6-66.9%], p < 0.001). Of 167/264 in the NPT-group with an STI who responded regarding partner-notification, 95.2% notified all/some partners; 85.9% notified them <24 hrs of the STI-specific result.
INTERPRETATION: Near-to-patient-testing significantly improved antibiotic use and a high proportion of individuals rapidly notified partners of STI-specific results, highlighting the broad benefits of timely diagnostic strategies for STIs in clinical decision making and partner notification.
FUNDING: ARC ITRP Hub-grant; NHMRC.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app