[Evolution of the rate of episiotomies and obstetric anal sphincter injuries since the last recommendations of 2018].

OBJECTIVES: There is a progressive reduction in the rate of episiotomies since the recommendations of the french college of gynaecologists. Our objective was to study the evolution of the rate of episiotomies and Obstetric Anus Sphincter Injury (OASI) since the restriction of episiotomies in our department.

METHODS: Observational monocentric retrospective study performed at the Rouen University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were monofetal pregnancies, delivery at a term greater than or equal to 37 weeks of amenorrhea of a living, viable child and by cephalic presentation. We compared two periods corresponding to before and after the 2018 recommendations. We used logistic regression modelling to identify factors associated with the risk of episiotomies and of obstetrical anal injuries, overall and in case of instrumental delivery.

RESULTS: We included 3329 patients for the 1st period and 3492 for the 2nd period, and the rate of instrumental deliveries were respectively of 16,4 % (n = 547) and 17,9% (n=626). Multivariate analysis showed a significant decrease in the rate of episiotomies in the 2nd period (OR 0,14, IC 95% [0,12 ; 0,16], p < 0,0001). Main factors associated with the risk of OASI were primiparity (OR 6,21, IC 95% [3,19 ; 12,11]) and the use of forceps (OR 4,23, IC 95% [2,17 ; 8,27]) overall; and instrumental delivery using forceps (OR 3,25, IC 95% [1,69 ; 6,22]) and delivery during the 2nd period (OR 1,98, IC 95% [1,01 ; 3,88]) in case of instrumental delivery.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that the voluntary reduction in the episiotomy rate does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of OASI, overall and in case of instrumental delivery. However, we show an increase in the rate of OASI in case of instrumental delivery since the latest recommendations.