The Effect of Feedback Modality When Learning a Novel Wrist Sensorimotor Transformation Through a Body-Machine Interface.

Body-Machine Interfaces (BoMIs) are promising assistive and rehabilitative tools for helping individuals with impaired motor abilities regain independence. When operating a BoMI, the user has to learn a novel sensorimotor transformation between the movement of certain body parts and the output of the device. In this study, we investigated how different feedback modalities impacted learning to operate a BoMI. Forty-seven able-bodied participants learned to control the velocity of a 1D cursor using the 3D rotation of their dominant wrist to reach as many targets as possible in a given amount of time. The map was designed to maximize cursor speed for movements around a predefined axis of wrist rotation. We compared the user's performance and control efficiency under three feedback modalities: i) visual feedback of the cursor position, ii) proprioceptive feedback of the cursor position delivered by a wrist manipulandum, iii) both i) and ii). We found that visual feedback led to a greater number of targets reached than proprioceptive feedback alone. Conversely, proprioceptive feedback yielded greater alignment between the axis of rotation of the wrist and the optimal axis represented by the map. These results suggest that proprioceptive feedback may be preferable over visual feedback when information about intrinsic task components, i.e. joint configurations, is of interest as in rehabilitative interventions aiming to promote more effective learning strategies.