Safety and Feasibility of an Emergency Department-to-Outpatient Pathway for Patients With TIA and Nondisabling Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of transient ischemic attack/nondisabling ischemic strokes (TIA/NDS) in the emergency department (ED) contributes to capacity issues and increasing health care expenditures, especially high-cost duplicative imaging.

METHODS: As an institutional quality improvement project, we developed a novel pathway to evaluate patients with TIA/NDS in the ED using a core set of laboratory tests and CT-based neuroimaging. Patients identified as 'low risk' through a safety checklist were discharged and scheduled for prompt outpatient tests and stroke clinic follow-up. In this prespecified analysis designed to assess feasibility and safety, we abstracted data from patients consecutively enrolled in the first 6 months.

RESULTS: We compared data from 106 patients with TIA/NDS enrolled in the new pathway from April through September 2020 (age 67.9 years, 45% female), against 55 unmatched historical controls with TIA encountered from April 2016 through March 2017 (age 68.3 years, 47% female). Both groups had similar median NIHSS scores (pathway and control 0) and ABCD2 scores (pathway and control 3). Pathway-enrolled patients had a 44% decrease in mean ED length of stay (pathway 13.7 hours, control 24.4 hours, p < 0.001) and decreased utilization of ED MRI-based imaging (pathway 63%, control 91%, p < 0.001) and duplicative ED CT plus MRI-based brain and/or vascular imaging (pathway 35%, control 53%, p = 0.04). Among pathway-enrolled patients, 89% were evaluated in our stroke clinic within a median of 5 business days; only 5.5% were lost to follow-up. Both groups had similar 90-day rates of ED revisits (pathway 21%, control 18%, p = 0.84) and recurrent TIA/ischemic stroke (pathway 1%, control 2%, p = 1.0). Recurrent ischemic events among pathway-enrolled patients were attributed to errors in following the safety checklist before discharge.

DISCUSSION: Our TIA/NDS pathway, implemented during the initial outbreak of COVID-19, seems feasible and safe, with significant positive impact on ED throughput and ED-based high-cost duplicative imaging. The safety checklist and option of virtual telehealth follow-up are novel features. Broader adoption of such pathways has important implications for value-based health care.