We have located links that may give you full text access.
Case Reports
Journal Article
Review
Difficulties in laboratory diagnosis of coexistent lupus anticoagulant and factor VIII inhibitors: case report and review of literature.
Annales de Biologie Clinique 2023 October 21
BACKGROUND: Whereas lupus anticoagulant (LA) and anti-factor VIII (anti-VIII) antibody are both acquired autoimmune coagulation inhibitors, they exhibit different pathophysiologic mechanisms and opposite clinical manifestations. Distinguishing between these two inhibitors is therefore essential for optimizing appropriate management. Harboring both antibodies, which is a rare condition, is of a challenging and confounding laboratory work-up.
CASE PRESENTATION: We illustrate a case report of a 39-year-old man admitted for the management of recurrent deep-vein thrombosis. Curiously, the initial physical examination revealed several hematoma and bruises of varying sizes. Biologically, a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was objectified and was not corrected by the mixing study. The following detection of synchronous LA and anti-VIII was made using specific assays.
CONCLUSIONS: Through this case, we illustrate the complexity of diagnosing coexistent LA and FVIII inhibitors. In fact, the biological hallmark of both inhibitors is an isolated prolonged APTT that does not correct by the mixing study. Despite the progress in LA and anti-VIII assays and the ongoing updating of standardized recommendations, the lack of specific tests for LA and the limited availability of VIII quantification tests other than the clot-based assays make it difficult to distinguish adequately between the two inhibitors. Therefore, it is crucial to correlate test results with clinical features and patient evaluation.
CASE PRESENTATION: We illustrate a case report of a 39-year-old man admitted for the management of recurrent deep-vein thrombosis. Curiously, the initial physical examination revealed several hematoma and bruises of varying sizes. Biologically, a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was objectified and was not corrected by the mixing study. The following detection of synchronous LA and anti-VIII was made using specific assays.
CONCLUSIONS: Through this case, we illustrate the complexity of diagnosing coexistent LA and FVIII inhibitors. In fact, the biological hallmark of both inhibitors is an isolated prolonged APTT that does not correct by the mixing study. Despite the progress in LA and anti-VIII assays and the ongoing updating of standardized recommendations, the lack of specific tests for LA and the limited availability of VIII quantification tests other than the clot-based assays make it difficult to distinguish adequately between the two inhibitors. Therefore, it is crucial to correlate test results with clinical features and patient evaluation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app