We have located links that may give you full text access.
Minimum 10-year Follow-up of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Ream-and-Run Arthroplasty for Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2023 September 29
BACKGROUND: Reports on long term outcomes and failures of shoulder arthroplasty are uncommon. The purpose of this study is to present minimum 10-year outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing ream-and-run and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for primary glenohumeral arthritis.
METHODS: This study analyzed consecutive patients that had undergone a ream-and-run or TSA with minimum 10-year follow-up. Pain scores and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) values were obtained preoperatively and at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively via e-mail or mail-in response. Percentage of maximum possible improvement (%MPI) was also calculated.
RESULTS: Of 127 eligible patients, 63 (50%) responded to a 10-year survey. This included 34 patients undergoing ream-and-run arthroplasty and 29 patients undergoing TSA. The ream-and-run patients were significantly younger than the TSA patients (60 ± 7 vs 68 ± 8, p<0.001), predominantly male (97% vs 41%, p<0.001), and had a lower American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p=0.018). In the ream-and run group, the mean pain score improved from a preoperative value of 6.5 ± 1.9 to 0.9 ± 1.3 (p < 0.001), and the mean SST score improved from 5.4 ± 2.4 to 10.3 ± 2.1 at 10-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Twenty-eight (82%) achieved an SST improvement above the MCID of 2.6. Four patients (12%) underwent single-stage exchange to another hemiarthroplasty, while 1 (3%) required manipulation under anesthesia. In the TSA group, the pain score improved from a preoperative value of 6.6 ± 2.2 to 1.2 ± 2.3 (p < 0.001), and the SST score improved from 3.8 ± 2.6 to 8.9 ± 2.6 at 10-year follow-up. (p < 0.001). Of the 29 patients who underwent a TSA, 27 (93%) achieved an SST improvement above the MCID of 1.6. No patient in the TSA group required reoperation.
CONCLUSION: While the characteristics of the patients differ between the two groups, excellent functional results can be obtained with the ream-and-run arthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
METHODS: This study analyzed consecutive patients that had undergone a ream-and-run or TSA with minimum 10-year follow-up. Pain scores and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) values were obtained preoperatively and at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively via e-mail or mail-in response. Percentage of maximum possible improvement (%MPI) was also calculated.
RESULTS: Of 127 eligible patients, 63 (50%) responded to a 10-year survey. This included 34 patients undergoing ream-and-run arthroplasty and 29 patients undergoing TSA. The ream-and-run patients were significantly younger than the TSA patients (60 ± 7 vs 68 ± 8, p<0.001), predominantly male (97% vs 41%, p<0.001), and had a lower American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p=0.018). In the ream-and run group, the mean pain score improved from a preoperative value of 6.5 ± 1.9 to 0.9 ± 1.3 (p < 0.001), and the mean SST score improved from 5.4 ± 2.4 to 10.3 ± 2.1 at 10-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Twenty-eight (82%) achieved an SST improvement above the MCID of 2.6. Four patients (12%) underwent single-stage exchange to another hemiarthroplasty, while 1 (3%) required manipulation under anesthesia. In the TSA group, the pain score improved from a preoperative value of 6.6 ± 2.2 to 1.2 ± 2.3 (p < 0.001), and the SST score improved from 3.8 ± 2.6 to 8.9 ± 2.6 at 10-year follow-up. (p < 0.001). Of the 29 patients who underwent a TSA, 27 (93%) achieved an SST improvement above the MCID of 1.6. No patient in the TSA group required reoperation.
CONCLUSION: While the characteristics of the patients differ between the two groups, excellent functional results can be obtained with the ream-and-run arthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app