Comparison of Habitual Versus Recurrent Patellar Dislocation in Children and Adolescents: Differences in Radiological Features.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) and habitual patellar dislocation (HPD) in flexion are frequently encountered in children and adolescents.

PURPOSE: To compare the radiological features of RPD and HPD in children and adolescents.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS: Imaging data were collected from patients aged 9 to 15 years who received surgical treatment for HPD or RPD at a single institution between June 2015 and September 2020. The prevalence of trochlear dysplasia, tibial tubercle lateralization, and lower limb rotational deformity was assessed through hip/knee/ankle computed tomography (CT) using the following quantitative indicators: trochlear depth index, lateral trochlear inclination, sulcus angle, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, ratio of TT-TG distance to femoral width, TT-TG angle, femoral anteversion angle, and tibial external rotation angle. The morphology of trochlea and patella were graded on knee CT using the Dejour and Wiberg classification. The Insall-Salvati index and Caton-Deschamps index were used to evaluate the height of the patella on lateral view radiographs. To evaluate lower limbs malalignment, the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle and medial proximal tibial angle were measured on weightbearing full-length radiographs. The collected data were analyzed and compared between the HPD and RPD groups.

RESULTS: Enrolled were 15 patients (21 knees) diagnosed with HPD and 18 patients (22 knees) diagnosed with RPD. The age of first dislocation was significantly younger in the HPD group (7.6 ± 3.4 vs 11.2 ± 1.4 years; P = 0.003). Knees in the HPD group had a significantly higher proportion of Dejour type C dysplasia (57.1% vs 4.5%; P < .005) and Wiberg type 3 patella (66.7% vs 9.1%; P < .001). There were statistically significant differences between the groups in the trochlear depth index (HPD vs RPD: 1.1 ± 1.7 vs 2.2 ± 1.5 mm; P = .039), sulcus angle (170.3° ± 13.7° vs 157.3° ± 16.0°; P = .007), Insall-Salvati index (1.1 ± 0.2 vs 1.3 ± 0.2; P = .034), and tibial external rotation angle (31.3° ± 7.8° vs 38.4° ± 8.5°; P = .009).

CONCLUSION: Patients in the HPD group presented with poorer trochlear and patellar development, lower patellar height, and less tibial external rotation compared with patients in the RPG group.