We have located links that may give you full text access.
Active Heating Following Cryolipolysis Reduces Efficacy as well as Side Effects - A Prospective Randomized Split-Body Trial.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2023 March 8
BACKGROUND: Cryolipolysis - a popular noninvasive technique for body contouring - has less side effects compared to liposuction, however, its effectiveness in terms of reducing local adipose tissue is also lower. This study is, to our knowledge, the first prospective controlled, investigator-blinded split body trial to evaluate whether post cryolipolytic heating can increase the efficacy.
METHODS: 25 subjects were treated with one session of cryolipolysis on the lower abdomen and a subsequent heating with a mud pack of a randomized side of the treated region (left or right). Epidemiological data, temperature, edema, erythema, hypesthesia and pain level were obtained. Photographs, fat layer thickness (on ultrasound, caliper and abdominal girth), satisfaction and side effects were documented over a follow-up period of 12 weeks.
RESULTS: The side effects - edema, erythema and hypesthesia - faded almost completely with heating, whereas they remained on the non-heated site. However, the mean sonographic reduction of local adipose tissue after 12 weeks was significantly lower on the heated than on the control sites (9.6% vs. 14.1%; p=0.0003). The overall satisfaction was high (9.2 out of 10 points), even though only 44% of participants had a subjective recognition of fat loss without difference between the sites.
CONCLUSIONS: Active heating following cryolipolysis increases bodily wellbeing by reducing common side effects. However, it reduces the effectiveness of cryolipolysis significantly and should therefore be avoided. Further improvements are necessary to enhance the efficacy of cryolipolysis.
METHODS: 25 subjects were treated with one session of cryolipolysis on the lower abdomen and a subsequent heating with a mud pack of a randomized side of the treated region (left or right). Epidemiological data, temperature, edema, erythema, hypesthesia and pain level were obtained. Photographs, fat layer thickness (on ultrasound, caliper and abdominal girth), satisfaction and side effects were documented over a follow-up period of 12 weeks.
RESULTS: The side effects - edema, erythema and hypesthesia - faded almost completely with heating, whereas they remained on the non-heated site. However, the mean sonographic reduction of local adipose tissue after 12 weeks was significantly lower on the heated than on the control sites (9.6% vs. 14.1%; p=0.0003). The overall satisfaction was high (9.2 out of 10 points), even though only 44% of participants had a subjective recognition of fat loss without difference between the sites.
CONCLUSIONS: Active heating following cryolipolysis increases bodily wellbeing by reducing common side effects. However, it reduces the effectiveness of cryolipolysis significantly and should therefore be avoided. Further improvements are necessary to enhance the efficacy of cryolipolysis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app