Intramedullary Fixation of Double-Barrel Vascularised Fibula Grafts With Subsequent Lengthening for Reconstruction of the Distal Femur in Patients With Osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: The use of vascularised fibula grafts is an accepted method for reconstructing the distal femur following resection of malignant childhood tumors. Limitations relate to the mismatch of the cross-sectional area of the transplanted fibula graft and the local bone, instability of the construct and union difficulties. We present midterm results of a unique staged technique-an immediate defect reconstruction using a double-barrel vascularised fibula graft set in in A-frame configuration and a subsequent intramedullary femoral lengthening.

METHODS: We retrospectively included 10 patients (mean age 10 y) with an osteosarcoma of the distal femur, who were treated according to the above-mentioned surgical technique. All patients were evaluated with regards to consolidation of the transplanted grafts, hypertrophy at the graft-host junctions, leg length discrepancies, lengthening indices, complications as well as functional outcome.

RESULTS: The mean defect size after tumor resection was 14.5 cm, the mean length of the harvested fibula graft 22 cm, resulting in a mean (acute) shortening of 4.7 cm (in 8 patients). Consolidation was achieved in all cases, 4 patients required supplementary bone grafting. Hypertrophy at the graft-host junctions was observed in 78% of the evaluable junctions. In total 11 intramedullary lengthening procedures in 9 patients had been performed at the last follow up. The mean Muskuloskeletal Society Rating Scale (MSTS) score of the evaluable 9 patients was 85% (57% to 100%) with good or excellent results in 7 patients.

CONCLUSIONS: A-frame vascularised fibula reconstructions showed encouraging results with respect to defect reconstruction, length as well as function and should therefore be considered a valuable option for reconstruction of the distal femur after osteosarcoma resection. The surgical implementation is demanding though, which is emphasized by the considerable high number of complications requiring surgical intervention, even though most were not serious.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.