We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparison of the Accuracy of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in Localizing Rectus Muscle Insertions.
Journal of Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility 2022 Februrary 2
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in localizing rectus muscle insertions.
METHODS: The study was performed on 27 patients (39 rectus muscles) who required primary or secondary surgery. Using caliper function in the AS-OCT and UBM software, the distance from the insertion site to the anterior chamber angle was measured. The actual muscle insertion distance from limbus was considered as the measured distance plus 1 mm. The measurements by UBM and AS-OCT were compared with intraoperative measurements and with each other.
RESULTS: AS-OCT and UBM were performed on 13 medial rectus, 24 lateral rectus, and 2 superior rectus muscles. Ninety two percent of UBM measurements (36 muscles) were within 1 mm, one was within 1-1.5 mm, and 2 were within 1.5-2 mm of surgery measurements. Eighty five percent of AS-OCT measurements (33 muscles) were within 1 mm, 5 were within 1-1.5 mm, and one was within 1.5-2 mm of surgery measurements. In all cases, the mean absolute error of the UBM (0.54 ± 0.44) and AS-OCT (0.51 ± 0.36) showed no significant difference (p = .76).
CONCLUSION: AS-OCT and UBM can be used interchangeably to localize rectus muscle insertions and showed good agreement with intraoperative measurements.
METHODS: The study was performed on 27 patients (39 rectus muscles) who required primary or secondary surgery. Using caliper function in the AS-OCT and UBM software, the distance from the insertion site to the anterior chamber angle was measured. The actual muscle insertion distance from limbus was considered as the measured distance plus 1 mm. The measurements by UBM and AS-OCT were compared with intraoperative measurements and with each other.
RESULTS: AS-OCT and UBM were performed on 13 medial rectus, 24 lateral rectus, and 2 superior rectus muscles. Ninety two percent of UBM measurements (36 muscles) were within 1 mm, one was within 1-1.5 mm, and 2 were within 1.5-2 mm of surgery measurements. Eighty five percent of AS-OCT measurements (33 muscles) were within 1 mm, 5 were within 1-1.5 mm, and one was within 1.5-2 mm of surgery measurements. In all cases, the mean absolute error of the UBM (0.54 ± 0.44) and AS-OCT (0.51 ± 0.36) showed no significant difference (p = .76).
CONCLUSION: AS-OCT and UBM can be used interchangeably to localize rectus muscle insertions and showed good agreement with intraoperative measurements.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app