Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus eyes with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to compare outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) against deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC).

METHODS: Keratoconic patients with VKC who received PK ( n  = 55, group 1) or DALK ( n  = 62, group 2) were retrospectively enrolled. The Student's t test, Mann-Whitney test, Fisher's exact test, chi-square test, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were used to compare outcomes between the groups.

RESULTS: The follow-up period was 59.4 ± 44.1 and 62.4 ± 38.9 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively ( p  = 0.70). Postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.24 ± 0.18 and 0.29 ± 0.19 logMAR, respectively ( p  = 0.13). Graft rejection occurred in 34.6% and 25.8% of eyes in groups 1 and 2, respectively ( p  = 0.30). Groups 1 and 2 were comparable in the rates of cataract (3.6% and 12.9%, respectively, p  = 0.07) and high intraocular pressure (3.6% and 8.1%, respectively, p  = 0.31). Compared with the eyes with inactive VKC, PK eyes that experienced postoperative disease reactivation had a higher rate of suture abscesses (10.9% versus 50.0%, respectively, p  = 0.01) and suture-tract vascularization (6.5% versus 33.3%, respectively, p  = 0.03). Similarly, disease reactivation significantly increased suture abscesses from 27.3% to 51.7% ( p  = 0.03) and suture-tract vascularization from 18.2% to 49.6% ( p  = 0.005) in the DALK group. The graft survival rates were 95.3% in group 1 and 87.9% in group 2 at the 4-year follow-up, with mean durations of 14.4 and 11.1 months, respectively ( p  = 0.20).

CONCLUSION: The results indicate no difference in outcomes between PK and DALK for keratoconus in patients with VKC. Postoperative VKC reactivation increased the rate of suture-related problems after both techniques of keratoplasty.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app