Long-term outcomes following use of a composite Wallstent-Z stent approach to iliofemoral venous stenting.

OBJECTIVE: An endovascular approach has essentially replaced open surgery in the management of symptomatic chronic obstructive iliofemoral venous disease. In the last several years, such a minimally invasive approach has shifted from use of Wallstents alone to a combination of Wallstent-Z stent (composite stenting) to better deal with the iliocaval confluence. This study evaluates the clinical and stent related outcomes following use of composite stenting.

METHODS: A retrospective review of contemporaneously entered EMR data on 535 patients (545 limbs) with initial iliofemoral stents placed over a 4-year period from 2014 to 2017 for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction was performed. Patients who underwent stenting after intervention for acute deep venous thrombosis were excluded. The impact of stenting on clinical outcomes before and after the intervention were evaluated through use of the visual analog scale pain score (0-10), grade of swelling (0-4), and Venous Clinical Severity Score (0-27). Quality of life was appraised using the Chronic Venous Disease quality of life Questionnaire 20 instrument. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess primary, primary assisted and secondary stent patencies, and paired and unpaired t-tests were used to examine clinical outcomes.

RESULTS: Of the 545 limbs that underwent stenting, 183 were in men and 362 were in women. The median age was 60 years. Laterality was right in 205 limbs and left in 340 limbs. Post-thrombotic syndrome was seen in 441 limbs and nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions/May-Thurner syndrome in 104 limbs. At 24 months, visual analog scale pain score went from 5 to 2 (P < .0001), grade of swelling went from 3 to 1 (P < .0001), and Venous Clinical Severity Score went from 6 to 4 (P < .0001). Ulcers were present in 67 limbs and had healed in 49 limbs (73%) over a median follow-up of 26 months. Global Chronic Venous Disease quality of life Questionnaire scores improved from 60 to 36 (P < .0001) after stenting. Cumulative primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patencies at 60 months were 70%, 99% and 91%, respectively. Thirty limbs (5.5%) required contralateral stenting. There was only one instance (0.2%) of contralateral iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. One hundred eleven limbs (20%) underwent reintervention, including for in-stent restenosis in 44 limbs, stent compression in 2 limbs, in-stent restenosis and stent compression in 48 limbs, and stent occlusion in 17 limbs.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing iliofemoral venous stenting for obstructive disease, clinical improvement, quality of life improvement, and stent patencies after use of a composite stent configuration are comparable with those seen after exclusive use of Wallstents. However, the use of a composite stent configuration not only decreases the need for contralateral stenting to relieve chronic obstruction, but also decreases the incidence of contralateral iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.