We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Detection of C. difficile toxin as a model assay for performing fully automated high-throughput RT-PCR on clinical stool samples.
Journal of Microbiological Methods 2020 May
BACKGROUND: The cobas® omni Utility Channel enables users to integrate lab-developed tests (LDTs) on the cobas® 6800 System to perform molecular diagnostics with high-throughput capacity and full automation. At present, there are no CE- or FDA-approved tests for stool pathogens on this system. To assess the performance of stool as a matrix, we evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of an LDT for detection of Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) toxin B using the Utility Channel (C.diff_UTC).
METHODS: A 10% stool suspension prepared from liquid stool samples diluted in phosphate buffered saline was used for analysis. Limit of detection (LoD) was determined in six dilutions with 126 replicates/dilution. Clinical evaluation was performed using 514 predetermined patient stool samples from two study sites in Germany. The C.diff_UTC was compared with LC 480 amplification and an LDT or the R-BioPharm C. difficile assay. Discrepant results were further analyzed using the GeneXpert C. difficile assay.
RESULTS: Limit of detection was 23.48 cfu/mL (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 19.14-31.01) with inter-run variation of <2 cycle thresholds at 3 × and 10 × LoD. No cross-reactivity was observed with a panel of fecal organisms and pathogens. Bioinformatic analysis showed coverage of the major C. difficile toxinotypes by the primer/probe set. Clinical evaluation revealed sensitivity of 96.7% (95% CI: 88.7-99.6) and specificity of 99.3% (95% CI: 98.0-99.9) compared with the reference method; inhibition rate was 3.5% (18/514).
CONCLUSION: Using a predesigned primer/probe set, the C.diff_UTC assay features analytical performance and clinical sensitivity and specificity comparable to currently available nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and is suitable for high-throughput testing. This was a proof-of-concept study, indicating the cobas Utility Channel could likely be adapted for other clinically relevant stool pathogens in outbreak scenarios.
METHODS: A 10% stool suspension prepared from liquid stool samples diluted in phosphate buffered saline was used for analysis. Limit of detection (LoD) was determined in six dilutions with 126 replicates/dilution. Clinical evaluation was performed using 514 predetermined patient stool samples from two study sites in Germany. The C.diff_UTC was compared with LC 480 amplification and an LDT or the R-BioPharm C. difficile assay. Discrepant results were further analyzed using the GeneXpert C. difficile assay.
RESULTS: Limit of detection was 23.48 cfu/mL (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 19.14-31.01) with inter-run variation of <2 cycle thresholds at 3 × and 10 × LoD. No cross-reactivity was observed with a panel of fecal organisms and pathogens. Bioinformatic analysis showed coverage of the major C. difficile toxinotypes by the primer/probe set. Clinical evaluation revealed sensitivity of 96.7% (95% CI: 88.7-99.6) and specificity of 99.3% (95% CI: 98.0-99.9) compared with the reference method; inhibition rate was 3.5% (18/514).
CONCLUSION: Using a predesigned primer/probe set, the C.diff_UTC assay features analytical performance and clinical sensitivity and specificity comparable to currently available nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and is suitable for high-throughput testing. This was a proof-of-concept study, indicating the cobas Utility Channel could likely be adapted for other clinically relevant stool pathogens in outbreak scenarios.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app