Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Validity of a visual scoring method using gummy jelly for evaluating chewing efficiency in a large-scale epidemiological survey.

BACKGROUND: Several methods exist for objectively evaluating chewing efficiency by using gummy jelly. However, the validity of the subjective visual evaluation of chewing efficiency has not been assessed.

OBJECTIVE: To verify with an epidemiological study the validity of a visual scoring method using gummy jelly by testing the relationship between masticatory performance (MP) using a fully automatic measuring system and visual score (VS) using a visual scoring method.

METHODS: Community-dwelling elderly individuals (n = 1234) ≥70 years old participated. One evaluator measured VS consecutively after participants chewed the gummy jelly (i.e., actual-VS). The chewed jelly was photographed. Two evaluators used the photograph to measure the gummy jelly (i.e., photo-VS). To test the validity of both methods, the correlation between actual-VS and MP and between photo-VS and MP were analyzed. Inter-rater reliability between the evaluators of photo-VS was analyzed.

RESULTS: Significant correlations existed between actual-VS and MP and between photo-VS and MP (r = 0.86-0.87; p < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient of the inter-rater reliability for photo-VS was very high (0.93; p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval: 0.877-0.953); however, the distribution of photo-VS deviated slightly from the actual-VS. A large coefficient of variation in the MP for low VSs suggested the influence of incomplete comminution, which was not reflected by the VS, and the accidental swallowing of small pieces during chewing.

CONCLUSION: The VS deviated slightly from the MP calculated using a fully automated method; however, the VS can be utilized for epidemiological surveys with numerous participants. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app