We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Multimodal approach for neurologic prognostication of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients undergoing targeted temperature management.
Resuscitation 2019 January
AIM: Since the introduction of targeted temperature management (TTM), the accuracy and timing of prognostic tests for post-cardiac arrest patients have changed. Although previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of a multimodal approach in assessing the prognosis of TTM patients, few studies have investigated an optimised strategy that sequentially combines different prognostic modalities. This study identified an optimal sequential combination of prognostic modalities to predict poor neurologic outcomes in patients undergoing TTM.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using TTM management registry data. All patients underwent an identical sequence of prognostic tests at fixed timings. The sequence included brain computed tomography (CT), serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE), electrophysiological examination, neurologic examination, and diffusion-weighted imaging. We used hierarchical classification and regression tree analysis to find the optimal prognostic model. The primary measure was a poor neurologic outcome at one month after cardiac arrest.
RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were included and 103 patients (53.6%) had poor neurologic outcomes. The final model consisted of brain CT, serum NSE, electroencephalogram, somatosensory-evoked potentials, and pupil light reflex. Our model predicted poor outcomes with a 0% false positive rate. Moreover, our model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.911 (95% confidence interval, 0.872-0.950), which was significantly higher than that of each prognostic modality alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Our stepwise model showed excellent prognostic ability to predict poor outcomes at one month after cardiac arrest and may be used to minimise the risk of false pessimistic predictions in patients undergoing TTM.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using TTM management registry data. All patients underwent an identical sequence of prognostic tests at fixed timings. The sequence included brain computed tomography (CT), serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE), electrophysiological examination, neurologic examination, and diffusion-weighted imaging. We used hierarchical classification and regression tree analysis to find the optimal prognostic model. The primary measure was a poor neurologic outcome at one month after cardiac arrest.
RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were included and 103 patients (53.6%) had poor neurologic outcomes. The final model consisted of brain CT, serum NSE, electroencephalogram, somatosensory-evoked potentials, and pupil light reflex. Our model predicted poor outcomes with a 0% false positive rate. Moreover, our model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.911 (95% confidence interval, 0.872-0.950), which was significantly higher than that of each prognostic modality alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Our stepwise model showed excellent prognostic ability to predict poor outcomes at one month after cardiac arrest and may be used to minimise the risk of false pessimistic predictions in patients undergoing TTM.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app