Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Systemwide clinical assessment of functioning based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in China: Interrater reliability, convergent, known group, and predictive validity of the ICF Generic-6.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the ICF Generic-6 in daily routine clinical practice in Mainland China. Specific objectives were to a) analyse the interrater reliability, b) convergent validity, c) known group validity and d) predictive validity of the ICF Generic-6.

DESIGN: Multi-centre prospective cohort study.

SETTING: 50 hospitals from 20 provinces of Mainland China.

PARTICIPANTS: 4510 patients from departments of Rehabilitation, Orthopaedics, Neurology, Cardiology, Pneumology, and Cerebral Surgery of the participating hospitals with different health condition were included in this study.

INTERVENTION: Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The assessment was undertaken by nurses with ICF Generic-6 in combination with a numeric rating scale. Interrater reliability was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Convergent validity was evaluated with Spearman correlation coefficients between ICF Generic-6 and SF-12 items. Known group-validity was examined by comparing discharge scores between different discharge destinations. Predictive validity was determined by employing ICF Generic-6 baseline scores for estimating length of hospital stay with a loglogistic survival model with gamma shared frailty and cost of in-hospital treatment with a mixed effects generalized linear regression model of the gamma family.

PRINCIPLE FINDING: The interrater reliability of items and score of ICF Generic-6 was good with ICCs ranging from 0.67 to 0.87. ICF Generic-6 items were further correlated with respective SF-12 items. Discharge scores of patients differed significantly by discharge destination. The ICF Generic-6 admission score was a significant predictor of length of stay and treatment cost.

CONCLUSIONS: The ICF Generic-6 administered in combination with a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale is a reliable and valid tool for the collection of minimal information on functioning across various clinical settings.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app