We have located links that may give you full text access.
Characterization of the torsional structural properties of feline femurs and surrogate bone models for mechanical testing of orthopedic implants.
Veterinary Surgery 2019 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the torsional structural properties of the feline femur and design a bone model surrogate for mechanical testing of feline orthopedic implants.
STUDY DESIGN: Experimental.
SAMPLE POPULATION: Paired feline femurs (n = 30) and bone models (8 materials, n = 4/group).
METHODS: Femurs were cyclically tested nondestructively in torsion and then loaded to failure. A generic femoral model was then designed from native femur dimensions and tested similarly by using 1 of 8 materials that were 3-dimensionally printed or machined. Outcome measures consisting of torsional compliance, angular deformation (AD), and torque to failure were compared by using Student's t test (P < .05). Failure modes are reported as descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Torsional compliance (1.6 ± 0.3°/Nm, 2.0 ± 0.1°/Nm), AD (3.1 ± 0.6°, 3.8 ± 0.2°) and torque to failure (7.8 ±1.2 Nm, 8.1 ± 1.3 Nm) did not differ between feline femurs and short-fiber epoxy (SFE) models. Conversely, most printed materials displayed excessive TC and failed by plastic deformation (AD > 15-fold that of native femurs) rather than by fracture. Feline bone and SFE both failed by spiral fractures.
CONCLUSION: None of the outcome measures differed between the 4th generation SFE model and cadaveric femurs, but differences were identified between feline bone and printed materials.
CLINICAL IMPACT: Machined SFE can be used to create a surrogate bone model with torsional structural properties similar to those of feline femurs. In contrast, common printable materials appear unsuitable to produce a realistic feline bone surrogate.
STUDY DESIGN: Experimental.
SAMPLE POPULATION: Paired feline femurs (n = 30) and bone models (8 materials, n = 4/group).
METHODS: Femurs were cyclically tested nondestructively in torsion and then loaded to failure. A generic femoral model was then designed from native femur dimensions and tested similarly by using 1 of 8 materials that were 3-dimensionally printed or machined. Outcome measures consisting of torsional compliance, angular deformation (AD), and torque to failure were compared by using Student's t test (P < .05). Failure modes are reported as descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Torsional compliance (1.6 ± 0.3°/Nm, 2.0 ± 0.1°/Nm), AD (3.1 ± 0.6°, 3.8 ± 0.2°) and torque to failure (7.8 ±1.2 Nm, 8.1 ± 1.3 Nm) did not differ between feline femurs and short-fiber epoxy (SFE) models. Conversely, most printed materials displayed excessive TC and failed by plastic deformation (AD > 15-fold that of native femurs) rather than by fracture. Feline bone and SFE both failed by spiral fractures.
CONCLUSION: None of the outcome measures differed between the 4th generation SFE model and cadaveric femurs, but differences were identified between feline bone and printed materials.
CLINICAL IMPACT: Machined SFE can be used to create a surrogate bone model with torsional structural properties similar to those of feline femurs. In contrast, common printable materials appear unsuitable to produce a realistic feline bone surrogate.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app