We have located links that may give you full text access.
Different outcomes in sporadic versus familial medullary thyroid cancer.
Head & Neck 2018 December 12
BACKGROUND: Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) has varying clinical course with familial cases (fMTC) diagnosed earlier than sporadic MTC (spMTC).
METHODS: A total of 273 MTCs (familial: n = 110 [40.3%], males: 38.5%) were followed for 1-35 years (median 5.0 years). Fifty one of the familial cases were operated because of positive findings at genetic screening. Disease extent at diagnosis and follow-up was recorded.
RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was: fMTC = 33.85 ± 16.5 years (range 4-74) and spMTC = 52.6 ± 14.0 years (range 16-81, P < .001). This difference remained when genetic screening cases were excluded. fMTCs had more frequently multifocality, smaller size, and more favorable stage at diagnosis (stages I and II: 60.9% vs 47.9%, stage III: 30.0% vs 23.9%, stage IV: 9.1% vs 28.9%, P = .01). fMTC had lower preoperative and postoperative calcitonin, more frequently remission (59.1% vs 47.2%) and less frequently progressive disease (8.2% vs 35.0%, P < .001). After excluding genetic screening cases, no difference in stage at diagnosis was observed. Outcome was more favorable in fMTC compared to sporadic (P = .002); the 10-year probability of lack of progression of disease differed significantly between fMTCs and spMTCs (86.4% vs 65.0%, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: After excluding genetic screening cases, although stage at diagnosis is similar, disease outcome remains worse in sporadic compared to fMTCs.
METHODS: A total of 273 MTCs (familial: n = 110 [40.3%], males: 38.5%) were followed for 1-35 years (median 5.0 years). Fifty one of the familial cases were operated because of positive findings at genetic screening. Disease extent at diagnosis and follow-up was recorded.
RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was: fMTC = 33.85 ± 16.5 years (range 4-74) and spMTC = 52.6 ± 14.0 years (range 16-81, P < .001). This difference remained when genetic screening cases were excluded. fMTCs had more frequently multifocality, smaller size, and more favorable stage at diagnosis (stages I and II: 60.9% vs 47.9%, stage III: 30.0% vs 23.9%, stage IV: 9.1% vs 28.9%, P = .01). fMTC had lower preoperative and postoperative calcitonin, more frequently remission (59.1% vs 47.2%) and less frequently progressive disease (8.2% vs 35.0%, P < .001). After excluding genetic screening cases, no difference in stage at diagnosis was observed. Outcome was more favorable in fMTC compared to sporadic (P = .002); the 10-year probability of lack of progression of disease differed significantly between fMTCs and spMTCs (86.4% vs 65.0%, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: After excluding genetic screening cases, although stage at diagnosis is similar, disease outcome remains worse in sporadic compared to fMTCs.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app