We have located links that may give you full text access.
Influence of Inspiratory/Expiratory CT Registration on Quantitative Air Trapping.
Academic Radiology 2018 December 11
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess variability in quantitative air trapping (QAT) measurements derived from spatially aligned expiration CT scans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four paired CT examinations, from 16 school-age cystic fibrosis subjects examined at four separate time intervals, were used in this study. For each pair, visually inspected lobe segmentation maps were generated and expiration CT data were registered to the inspiration CT frame. Measurements of QAT, the percentage of voxels on the expiration CT scan below a set threshold were calculated for each lobe and whole-lung from the registered expiration CT and compared to the true values from the unregistered data.
RESULTS: A mathematical model, which simulates the effect of variable regions of lung deformation on QAT values calculated from aligned to those from unaligned data, showed the potential for large bias. Assessment of experimental QAT measurements using Bland-Altman plots corroborated the model simulations, demonstrating biases greater than 5% when QAT was approximately 40% of lung volume. These biases were removed when calculating QAT from aligned expiration CT data using the determinant of the Jacobian matrix. We found, by Dice coefficient analysis, good agreement between aligned expiration and inspiration segmentation maps for the whole-lung and all but one lobe (Dice coefficient > 0.9), with only the lingula generating a value below 0.9 (mean and standard deviation of 0.85 ± 0.06).
CONCLUSION: The subtle and predictable variability in corrected QAT observed in this study suggests that image registration is reliable in preserving the accuracy of the quantitative metrics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four paired CT examinations, from 16 school-age cystic fibrosis subjects examined at four separate time intervals, were used in this study. For each pair, visually inspected lobe segmentation maps were generated and expiration CT data were registered to the inspiration CT frame. Measurements of QAT, the percentage of voxels on the expiration CT scan below a set threshold were calculated for each lobe and whole-lung from the registered expiration CT and compared to the true values from the unregistered data.
RESULTS: A mathematical model, which simulates the effect of variable regions of lung deformation on QAT values calculated from aligned to those from unaligned data, showed the potential for large bias. Assessment of experimental QAT measurements using Bland-Altman plots corroborated the model simulations, demonstrating biases greater than 5% when QAT was approximately 40% of lung volume. These biases were removed when calculating QAT from aligned expiration CT data using the determinant of the Jacobian matrix. We found, by Dice coefficient analysis, good agreement between aligned expiration and inspiration segmentation maps for the whole-lung and all but one lobe (Dice coefficient > 0.9), with only the lingula generating a value below 0.9 (mean and standard deviation of 0.85 ± 0.06).
CONCLUSION: The subtle and predictable variability in corrected QAT observed in this study suggests that image registration is reliable in preserving the accuracy of the quantitative metrics.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app