Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The Impact of Photorefractive Keratectomy and Mitomycin C on Corneal Nerves and Their Regeneration.

PURPOSE: To determine how photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and mitomycin C (MMC) affect corneal nerves and their regeneration over time after surgery.

METHODS: Twenty-eight New Zealand rabbits had corneal epithelial scraping with (n = 3) and without (n = 3) MMC 0.02% or -9.00 diopter PRK with (n = 6) and without (n = 16) MMC 0.02%. Corneas were removed after death and corneal nerve morphology was evaluated using acetylcholinesterase immunohistochemistry and beta-III tubulin staining after 1 day for all groups, after 1 month for PRK with and without MMC, and 2, 3, and 6 months after PRK without MMC. Image-Pro software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD) was used to quantitate the area of nerve loss after the procedures and, consequently, regeneration of the nerves over time. Opposite eyes were used as controls.

RESULTS: Epithelial scraping with MMC treatment did not show a statistically significant difference in nerve loss compared to epithelial scraping without MMC (P = .40). PRK with MMC was significantly different from PRK without MMC at 1 day after surgery (P = .0009) but not different at 1 month after surgery (P = .90). In the PRK without MMC group, nerves regenerated at 2 months (P < .0001) but did not return to the normal preoperative level of innervation until 3 months after surgery (P = .05). However, the morphology of the regenerating nerves was abnormal-with more tortuosity and aberrant innervation compared to the preoperative controls-even at 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: PRK negatively impacts the corneal nerves, but they are partially regenerated by 3 months after surgery in rabbits. Nerve loss after PRK extended peripherally to the excimer laser ablated zone, indicating that there was retrograde degeneration of nerves after PRK. MMC had a small additive toxic effect on the corneal nerves when combined with PRK that was only significant prior to 1 month after surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(12):790-798.].

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app