Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Hospital pharmacy technicians practice and perceptions in France and Quebec, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: To describe practice and perceptions of hospital pharmacy technicians (HPTs) in France and in Quebec, Canada. The secondary objective was to compare both work settings to identify differences.

METHODS: Cross-sectional online survey in December 2016 and February 2017. The survey was comprised of four sections: demographic, factors contributing to career choice and satisfaction, perceptions regarding training, skills and recognition and interest in new opportunities. The proportion of responses from respondents in France and Quebec was compared with a chi-squared test.

KEY FINDINGS: There were 101 respondents from France and 224 from Quebec. In comparison with Quebec respondents, French respondents came from large hospitals (France: 87%, 84/97 versus Quebec: 50%, 112/223, P < 0.001). Few HPTs supported pharmacists' clinical activities (France: 4%, 4/97 versus Quebec: 29%, 65/222, P < 0.001). A majority of HPTs indicated that working in the healthcare field contributed to their job satisfaction (France: 94%, 87/93 versus Quebec: 90%, 188/209). Respondents found their training sufficient (France: 54%, 49/90 versus Quebec: 78%, 159/205, P < 0.001). However, few identified having access to sufficient continuing education (France: 40%, 36/90 versus Quebec: 29%, 59/205). Not many thought that their job was well recognized in their centre (France: 13%, 12/90 versus Quebec: 13%, 26/203). However, they felt it had a direct impact on the quality of care, especially in Quebec (France: 86%, 77/90 versus Quebec: 98%, 199/203, P < 0.001). The majority was interested in supporting the pharmacists' clinical activities (France: 91%, 78/86 versus Quebec: 82%, 163/199).

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, HTP from France and Quebec shared a satisfaction about their profession. They showed an interest in increased recognition and responsibilities (e.g. training, pharmacist support).

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app