We have located links that may give you full text access.
Exercise worsening of electromechanical disturbances: a predictor of arrhythmia in long qt syndrome.
Clinical Cardiology 2018 December 10
BACKGROUND: Electromechanical (EM) coupling heterogeneity is significant in long QT syndrome (LQTS), particularly in symptomatic patients; EM window (EMW) has been proposed as an indicator of interaction and a better predictor of arrhythmia than QTc.
AIM: To investigate the dynamic response of EMW to exercise in LQTS and its predictive value of arrhythmia.
METHODS: Forty-seven LQTS carriers (45±15 years, 20 with arrhythmic events) and 35 controls underwent exercise echocardiogram. EMW was measured as the time difference between aortic valve closure on Doppler and the end of QT interval on the superimposed ECG. Measurements were obtained at rest, peak exercise (p.e.) and 4 minutes into recovery.
RESULTS: Patients did not differ in age, gender, heart rate or LV ejection fraction but had a negative resting EMW compared to controls (-42±22 vs 17±5ms, p<0.0001). EMW became more negative at p.e. (-89±43 vs 16±7ms, p=0.0001) and recovery (-65±39 vs 16±6ms, p=0.001) in patients, particularly the symptomatic, but remained unchanged in controls. P.e. EMW was a stronger predictor of arrhythmic events than QTc (AUC:0.765 vs 0.569, P<0.001). B-Blockers did not affect EMW at rest but was less negative at p.e. (BB: -66±21 vs no-BB: -113±25ms, p<0.001). LQT1 patients had worse p.e. EMW negativity than LQT2.
CONCLUSION: LQTS patients have significantly negative EMW, which worsens with exercise. These changes are more pronounced in patients with documented arrhythmic events and decrease with B-blocker therapy. Thus, EMW assessment during exercise may help improve risk stratification and management of LQTS patients.
AIM: To investigate the dynamic response of EMW to exercise in LQTS and its predictive value of arrhythmia.
METHODS: Forty-seven LQTS carriers (45±15 years, 20 with arrhythmic events) and 35 controls underwent exercise echocardiogram. EMW was measured as the time difference between aortic valve closure on Doppler and the end of QT interval on the superimposed ECG. Measurements were obtained at rest, peak exercise (p.e.) and 4 minutes into recovery.
RESULTS: Patients did not differ in age, gender, heart rate or LV ejection fraction but had a negative resting EMW compared to controls (-42±22 vs 17±5ms, p<0.0001). EMW became more negative at p.e. (-89±43 vs 16±7ms, p=0.0001) and recovery (-65±39 vs 16±6ms, p=0.001) in patients, particularly the symptomatic, but remained unchanged in controls. P.e. EMW was a stronger predictor of arrhythmic events than QTc (AUC:0.765 vs 0.569, P<0.001). B-Blockers did not affect EMW at rest but was less negative at p.e. (BB: -66±21 vs no-BB: -113±25ms, p<0.001). LQT1 patients had worse p.e. EMW negativity than LQT2.
CONCLUSION: LQTS patients have significantly negative EMW, which worsens with exercise. These changes are more pronounced in patients with documented arrhythmic events and decrease with B-blocker therapy. Thus, EMW assessment during exercise may help improve risk stratification and management of LQTS patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app