We have located links that may give you full text access.
Distal-to-proximal delay for ablation of premature ventricular contractions.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 2018 December 6
INTRODUCTION: Ablation of premature ventricular contractions has emerged as a safe and effective treatment in patients experiencing a high premature ventricular contractions burden. Mapping of premature ventricular contractions origin may sometimes be challenging. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of a new electrophysiological criterion, the Distal-to-Proximal Delay, at localizing the optimal site for ablation of ventricular ectopic foci.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with ablation attempts of symptomatic premature ventricular contractions were included. Prematurity and Distal-to-Proximal Delay - i.e., time duration between the onset of ablation catheter distal bipolar electrogram and the onset of proximal bipolar electrogram - were measured at successful and unsuccessful ablation sites by 3 blinded experienced electrophysiologists. Mean Distal-to-Proximal Delay at effective ablation sites (N=30) was significantly higher than at ineffective sites (N=55) (23±9 vs 11±8 ms, p<0.0001). Distal-to-Proximal Delay had good to excellent interrater reliability. A Distal-to-Proximal Delay ≥15 ms had the highest accuracy at predicting a successful ablation site (sensitivity 0.97, area under ROC curve 0.87, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Distal-to-Proximal Delay is an additional, simple and effective electrophysiological parameter to accurately localize premature ventricular contractions foci. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with ablation attempts of symptomatic premature ventricular contractions were included. Prematurity and Distal-to-Proximal Delay - i.e., time duration between the onset of ablation catheter distal bipolar electrogram and the onset of proximal bipolar electrogram - were measured at successful and unsuccessful ablation sites by 3 blinded experienced electrophysiologists. Mean Distal-to-Proximal Delay at effective ablation sites (N=30) was significantly higher than at ineffective sites (N=55) (23±9 vs 11±8 ms, p<0.0001). Distal-to-Proximal Delay had good to excellent interrater reliability. A Distal-to-Proximal Delay ≥15 ms had the highest accuracy at predicting a successful ablation site (sensitivity 0.97, area under ROC curve 0.87, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Distal-to-Proximal Delay is an additional, simple and effective electrophysiological parameter to accurately localize premature ventricular contractions foci. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app