We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Comparative evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay with multiplex polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis.
Tuberculosis 2018 December
BACKGROUND: Rapid and specific diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is of paramount importance to decrease morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay (GXpert) and multiplex PCR (MPCR) using three targets (IS6110, MPB64 and protein B) for diagnosing tuberculous meningitis.
METHODS: GXpert and MPCR were performed on cerebrospinal fluid samples of 225 patients out of which 80 were culture-positive confirmed cases of TBM, 100 were 'suspected' cases of TBM and 45 were non-TBM controls. rpoB gene sequencing was done for diagnosing rifampicin (Rif) resistance in all positive cases.
RESULTS: GXpert and MPCR were positive in 91/180 (50.5%) and 157/180 (87.2%) confirmed or suspected TBM patients respectively. Both the tests were negative in all 45 controls. Rif resistance was detected in 14 cases by GXpert and in 13 cases by MPCR. Rif resistance was confirmed in 13 cases with rpoB gene sequencing. There was one case of false Rif resistance detected by GXpert which was Rif susceptible on rpoB gene sequencing. Cost of doing MPCR was less than USD1 whereas GXpert required USD10 per isolate.
CONCLUSION: MPCR has a higher sensitivity than GXpert for diagnosing TBM. MPCR is a robust and cost effective method for diagnosis of TBM in low-resource and high-endemic countries.
METHODS: GXpert and MPCR were performed on cerebrospinal fluid samples of 225 patients out of which 80 were culture-positive confirmed cases of TBM, 100 were 'suspected' cases of TBM and 45 were non-TBM controls. rpoB gene sequencing was done for diagnosing rifampicin (Rif) resistance in all positive cases.
RESULTS: GXpert and MPCR were positive in 91/180 (50.5%) and 157/180 (87.2%) confirmed or suspected TBM patients respectively. Both the tests were negative in all 45 controls. Rif resistance was detected in 14 cases by GXpert and in 13 cases by MPCR. Rif resistance was confirmed in 13 cases with rpoB gene sequencing. There was one case of false Rif resistance detected by GXpert which was Rif susceptible on rpoB gene sequencing. Cost of doing MPCR was less than USD1 whereas GXpert required USD10 per isolate.
CONCLUSION: MPCR has a higher sensitivity than GXpert for diagnosing TBM. MPCR is a robust and cost effective method for diagnosis of TBM in low-resource and high-endemic countries.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app