JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Establishment of inflammation biomarkers-based nomograms to predict prognosis of advanced colorectal cancer patients based on real world data.

PURPOSE: To establish three novel prognostic nomograms with inflammatory factors for advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC), right-sided colon cancer (RSCC) and left-sided colorectal cancer (LSCRC) according to real world data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: ACRC patients receiving medicine therapy from January 1st, 2005 to September 31th, 2015 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were enrolled. Inflammatory indicators such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were analyzed for establishing nomograms predicting overall survival (OS). Concordance index (C-index) determined predictive accuracy and discriminative ability.

RESULTS: Our study selected 807 ACRC patients, 29.6% RSCC and 70.4% LSCRC. Median OS was 23.36 months. Patients at lower level of NLR, PLR, CEA, CA 19-9, LDH and CRP showed longer OS (P < 0.001). For all patients, pathological grade (P = 0.018), treatments (P = 0.042), sidedness (P = 0.003), NLR (P < 0.001), CA 19-9 (P < 0.001), LDH (P < 0.001) and CRP (P = 0.0012) contributed to OS independently. For RSCC, pathological grade (P = 0.022), CA 19-9 (P < 0.001), LDH (P < 0.001) and CRP (P = 0.001) were significantly related with OS. For LSCRC patients, treatments (cetuximab vs chemotherapy: P = 0.008; bevacizumab vs chemotherapy: P = 0.166), NLR (P < 0.001), CA 19-9 (P = 0.030) and LDH (P < 0.001) were independent factors for OS. Final models showed acceptable internal validity with C-indexes of 0.687, 0.697 and 0.667 in all, RSCC and LSCRC patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory factors enrolled in the proposed nomograms showed accurately individualized prognostic prediction, and prognostic factors for RSCC and LSCRC were different.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app