We have located links that may give you full text access.
Prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2018 December 2
OBJECTIVES: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to be a promising biomarker in several cancers. Prognostic biomarkers are still needed to define good candidates for lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the role of NLR.
METHODS: Data from 574 patients who underwent lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer in 3 departments of thoracic surgery from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and the time to pulmonary recurrence (TTPR) were the main end points.
RESULTS: Correlations between NLR and OS (R2 = 0.53), and NLR and TTPR (R2 = 0.389) were significant (P < 0.0001 for both), with corresponding Pearson R of -0.728 (P < 0.0001) and -0.624 (P < 0.0001), respectively. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis highlighted an NLR cut-off value of 4.05 as the best predictor of OS and TTPR. NLR ≤4.05 was observed in 238 patients (41.4%). In the univariable analysis, the median OS was 117 months for patients with NLR ≤4.05 and decreased to 40 months for patients with NLR >4.05 (P < 0.0001). The median TTPR reached 52 months in case of NLR ≤4.05 and decreased to 12 months in patients with NLR >4.05. In the multivariable analysis, NLR ≤4.05 remained an independent favourable prognostic factor on both OS [hazard ratio [HR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.167-0.503; P < 0.0001] and TTPR (HR 0.346, 95% CI 0.221-0.54; P < 0.0001). Significant correlations between NLR >4.05 and KRAS (Cramer's V = 0.241, P < 0.0001) and BRAF (Cramer's V = 0.153, P = 0.003) mutations were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: NLR is a simple and powerful predictor of outcomes in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.
METHODS: Data from 574 patients who underwent lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer in 3 departments of thoracic surgery from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and the time to pulmonary recurrence (TTPR) were the main end points.
RESULTS: Correlations between NLR and OS (R2 = 0.53), and NLR and TTPR (R2 = 0.389) were significant (P < 0.0001 for both), with corresponding Pearson R of -0.728 (P < 0.0001) and -0.624 (P < 0.0001), respectively. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis highlighted an NLR cut-off value of 4.05 as the best predictor of OS and TTPR. NLR ≤4.05 was observed in 238 patients (41.4%). In the univariable analysis, the median OS was 117 months for patients with NLR ≤4.05 and decreased to 40 months for patients with NLR >4.05 (P < 0.0001). The median TTPR reached 52 months in case of NLR ≤4.05 and decreased to 12 months in patients with NLR >4.05. In the multivariable analysis, NLR ≤4.05 remained an independent favourable prognostic factor on both OS [hazard ratio [HR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.167-0.503; P < 0.0001] and TTPR (HR 0.346, 95% CI 0.221-0.54; P < 0.0001). Significant correlations between NLR >4.05 and KRAS (Cramer's V = 0.241, P < 0.0001) and BRAF (Cramer's V = 0.153, P = 0.003) mutations were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: NLR is a simple and powerful predictor of outcomes in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app