We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effects of different regimens for pelvic floor muscle training in young continent women: Randomized controlled clinical trial.
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 2018 November 21
BACKGROUND: Physical therapy is recommended as first-line treatment to urinary incontinence (UI), and pelvic floor muscles (PFM) training is one of the most used resources for this purpose, no ideal PFM training protocol has been established.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to verify whether more daily sessions of PFM training lead to better PFM function.
METHODS: Twenty-five young continent women volunteered and were randomly assigned to 2 different groups; group 1, in which they performed one PFM training session daily, and group 2, in which they performed 3 daily PFM training sessions. All volunteers were evaluated regarding PFM function, based on the Modified Oxford Scale, maximum voluntary contraction, with a manometer, and PFM activation, with electromyography. Both groups trained during 8 consecutive weeks and were evaluated before and after treatment. All evaluations had the reproducibility tested by intraclass correlation coefficients. Statistical analyzes included data normality (Shapiro-Wilks), intragroup (Wilcoxon) and intergroup (Mann-Whitney U) comparisons. Effect sizes were calculated to all variables analyzed. Significance level was set al p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Even though an increase in PFM strength, pressure and muscle activation was achieved by both groups (p < 0.05, effect sizes from 0.24 to 0.81), no differences between groups for any variables were detected (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The number of daily training sessions does not interfere in the improvement of PFM function in young women without PFM dysfunction.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to verify whether more daily sessions of PFM training lead to better PFM function.
METHODS: Twenty-five young continent women volunteered and were randomly assigned to 2 different groups; group 1, in which they performed one PFM training session daily, and group 2, in which they performed 3 daily PFM training sessions. All volunteers were evaluated regarding PFM function, based on the Modified Oxford Scale, maximum voluntary contraction, with a manometer, and PFM activation, with electromyography. Both groups trained during 8 consecutive weeks and were evaluated before and after treatment. All evaluations had the reproducibility tested by intraclass correlation coefficients. Statistical analyzes included data normality (Shapiro-Wilks), intragroup (Wilcoxon) and intergroup (Mann-Whitney U) comparisons. Effect sizes were calculated to all variables analyzed. Significance level was set al p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Even though an increase in PFM strength, pressure and muscle activation was achieved by both groups (p < 0.05, effect sizes from 0.24 to 0.81), no differences between groups for any variables were detected (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The number of daily training sessions does not interfere in the improvement of PFM function in young women without PFM dysfunction.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app