We have located links that may give you full text access.
Outcomes of different rehabilitative procedures in patients with pulmonary atresia, ventricular septal defect and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries.
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2019 May 2
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare our clinical outcomes of the central shunt and the right ventricle-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) connection in patients with pulmonary atresia, ventricular septal defect and the major aortopulmonary collateral arteries.
METHODS: From November 2009 to October 2017, a total of 157 consecutive patients with pulmonary atresia, ventricular septal defect, the major aortopulmonary collateral arteries and the hypoplastic PAs who underwent palliative surgery were included. Seventy patients underwent the central shunt (the central shunt group) and 87 patients underwent the RV-PA connection (the RV-PA group). Propensity score matching was used to create 2 cohorts with similar baseline characteristics: 56 central shunt patients were one-to-one-matched with 56 RV-PA connection patients. The early and late outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 18 months in the central shunt group and 22 months in the RV-PA group (P = 0.10). The probability of complete repair was significantly lower in the central shunt group as compared with the RV-PA group (P = 0.048). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of complete repair rates were 47.2 ± 10.0% after 3 years and 56.0 ± 11.6% after 5 years in the central shunt group, which were lower as compared with 62.3 ± 7.6% after 3 years and 74.5 ± 7.2% after 5 years in the RV-PA group. The increase in the mean McGoon ratio and the mean Nakata index were significantly lower in the central shunt group than those in the RV-PA group (0.57 ± 0.52 vs 1.02 ± 0.44, P = 0.036; 98.2 ± 35.1 mm2/m2 vs 176.9 ± 85.4 mm2/m2, P = 0.025, respectively). The in-hospital morbidity and mortality after complete repair were similar between 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the central shunt, the RV-PA connection appears to be a more effective palliative procedure to improve the probability of complete repair and PA growth in patients with pulmonary atresia, ventricular septal defect and the major aortopulmonary collateral arteries, in whom primary repair is not feasible.
METHODS: From November 2009 to October 2017, a total of 157 consecutive patients with pulmonary atresia, ventricular septal defect, the major aortopulmonary collateral arteries and the hypoplastic PAs who underwent palliative surgery were included. Seventy patients underwent the central shunt (the central shunt group) and 87 patients underwent the RV-PA connection (the RV-PA group). Propensity score matching was used to create 2 cohorts with similar baseline characteristics: 56 central shunt patients were one-to-one-matched with 56 RV-PA connection patients. The early and late outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 18 months in the central shunt group and 22 months in the RV-PA group (P = 0.10). The probability of complete repair was significantly lower in the central shunt group as compared with the RV-PA group (P = 0.048). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of complete repair rates were 47.2 ± 10.0% after 3 years and 56.0 ± 11.6% after 5 years in the central shunt group, which were lower as compared with 62.3 ± 7.6% after 3 years and 74.5 ± 7.2% after 5 years in the RV-PA group. The increase in the mean McGoon ratio and the mean Nakata index were significantly lower in the central shunt group than those in the RV-PA group (0.57 ± 0.52 vs 1.02 ± 0.44, P = 0.036; 98.2 ± 35.1 mm2/m2 vs 176.9 ± 85.4 mm2/m2, P = 0.025, respectively). The in-hospital morbidity and mortality after complete repair were similar between 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the central shunt, the RV-PA connection appears to be a more effective palliative procedure to improve the probability of complete repair and PA growth in patients with pulmonary atresia, ventricular septal defect and the major aortopulmonary collateral arteries, in whom primary repair is not feasible.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app