We have located links that may give you full text access.
Service providers' and health professionals' views and suggestions for the Australian National Meal Guidelines for the Commonwealth Home Support Program.
AIM: To summarise the views and suggestions of service providers and health professionals on issues related to the development of National Meal Guidelines.
METHODS: A national online survey of meal service providers and health professionals in Australia was conducted. Potential participants were identified from previously conducted workshop consultations. Snowball sampling was used whereby participants were encouraged to share the survey link with relevant colleagues. De-identified data were collated and closed responses calculated based on the proportion of participants answering each question. Open-ended responses were systematically examined to identify common themes within the data.
RESULTS: The 289 participants were mostly female (83%) and service providers (47%). Most participants described their services to be home-delivery (57%), sourcing meals from external providers (47%), were providing menu choice (59%), and were able to cater for special diets (95%). Participants felt that National Meal Guidelines would be beneficial in improving meal service provision and promoting consistency between organisations but were concerned that they may be impractical and costly. They also identified priority areas for inclusion in the guidelines including nutrition recommendations for customers, dietary modifications for special needs, menu variety/structure and considerations about meal types. Nourishing mid-meal snacks, food fortification and screening and monitoring of malnutrition are future considerations for service activities.
CONCLUSIONS: Future research should examine the uptake and satisfaction of service providers and health professionals with the National Meal Guidelines.
METHODS: A national online survey of meal service providers and health professionals in Australia was conducted. Potential participants were identified from previously conducted workshop consultations. Snowball sampling was used whereby participants were encouraged to share the survey link with relevant colleagues. De-identified data were collated and closed responses calculated based on the proportion of participants answering each question. Open-ended responses were systematically examined to identify common themes within the data.
RESULTS: The 289 participants were mostly female (83%) and service providers (47%). Most participants described their services to be home-delivery (57%), sourcing meals from external providers (47%), were providing menu choice (59%), and were able to cater for special diets (95%). Participants felt that National Meal Guidelines would be beneficial in improving meal service provision and promoting consistency between organisations but were concerned that they may be impractical and costly. They also identified priority areas for inclusion in the guidelines including nutrition recommendations for customers, dietary modifications for special needs, menu variety/structure and considerations about meal types. Nourishing mid-meal snacks, food fortification and screening and monitoring of malnutrition are future considerations for service activities.
CONCLUSIONS: Future research should examine the uptake and satisfaction of service providers and health professionals with the National Meal Guidelines.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app