Journal Article
Observational Study
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Intestinal failure associated cholestasis in surgical necrotizing enterocolitis and spontaneous intestinal perforation.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) is often complicated by intestinal failure (IF) and intestinal failure associated cholestasis (IFAC).

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of incidence, predictors, and mortality associated with IFAC in surgically treated NEC and SIP.

METHODS: A retrospective observational study based on hospital records during 1986-2014 in the two largest Finnish neonatal intensive care units was performed. IFAC was defined as conjugated bilirubin >34 μmol/l (2.0 mg/dl) for ≥ two postoperative weeks while receiving parenteral nutrition (PN).

RESULTS: In total 225 patients underwent surgery for NEC (n = 142; 63%) or SIP (n = 83; 37%). Included were 57 survivors with ≥two weeks PN. Sixty-five (42%) patients developed IFAC. Two-year survival with IFAC was 80% and without IFAC 89% (p = 0.13). Of the 65 patients with IFAC, all eight with unresolved IFAC died in comparison to six of 57 (11%) whose IFAC resolved (p < 0.0001), while IFAC resolved in all survivors. Survival among patients with resolved IFAC was 89% and with unresolved IFAC (n = 8) 0%, (p < 0.0001). IFAC lasted for median 83 (IQR 45-120) days and correlated with the duration of PN (R2 = 0.16, p = 0.03), delay of starting enteral feeds (R2 = 0.12, p = 0.05) and PN lipid emulsion (RR = 1.0 (95% CI = 1.0-1.1) (p = 0.02). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, IFAC development associated with septicemias and reoperations.

CONCLUSIONS: 42% of prematures who underwent surgery for NEC or SIP developed IFAC. Reoperations and septicemias increased the risk of IFAC. None of the patients with unresolved IFAC survived, but IFAC did not increase overall mortality.

TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective prognosis study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app