We have located links that may give you full text access.
Double factor single shot to diminish complications in cryoballoon ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation.
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology : An International Journal of Arrhythmias and Pacing 2018 November 9
PURPOSE: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) has become a standard treatment for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). There is need for improved CBA protocols. We aimed to demonstrate that a new protocol including minimum temperature (minT) reached could reduce procedure times and complications.
METHODS: A new double factor protocol (DFP), based on the performance of one single shot per vein with variable duration, and conditional bonus shot, determined by time-to-effect (TTE) and minT, was compared with the conventional protocol (CP), with at least two shots per vein. Procedure parameters, complications, and efficacy were compared.
RESULTS: We prospectively included 88 consecutive patients treated with the DFP. These were compared to the previous consecutive 69 patients treated with CP. All procedures were performed with 28-mm second-generation balloon. Acute pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was similar (98.6% vs. 98.9% in CP vs. DFP, p = 0.687). Procedure and ablation times favored DFP over CP (120 vs. 134 min, p = 0.003; and 1051 vs. 1475 s, p < 0.001; respectively). A composite of major and minor complications was significantly reduced in the DFP compared to the CP (18.8% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.02; respectively). Within a follow-up of 18 months, freedom from AF was 79.7% in CP and 78.4% in DFP (Log-rank 0.501). Paroxysmal AF and absence of PV potentials predicted better arrhythmia outcomes (HR 2.14 for paroxysmal vs. persistent, p = 0.031; and HR 1.61 for absence vs. presence of PV potentials, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The novel DFP results in reduced complication rates and procedure times, with similar success rates compared with a conventional strategy.
METHODS: A new double factor protocol (DFP), based on the performance of one single shot per vein with variable duration, and conditional bonus shot, determined by time-to-effect (TTE) and minT, was compared with the conventional protocol (CP), with at least two shots per vein. Procedure parameters, complications, and efficacy were compared.
RESULTS: We prospectively included 88 consecutive patients treated with the DFP. These were compared to the previous consecutive 69 patients treated with CP. All procedures were performed with 28-mm second-generation balloon. Acute pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was similar (98.6% vs. 98.9% in CP vs. DFP, p = 0.687). Procedure and ablation times favored DFP over CP (120 vs. 134 min, p = 0.003; and 1051 vs. 1475 s, p < 0.001; respectively). A composite of major and minor complications was significantly reduced in the DFP compared to the CP (18.8% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.02; respectively). Within a follow-up of 18 months, freedom from AF was 79.7% in CP and 78.4% in DFP (Log-rank 0.501). Paroxysmal AF and absence of PV potentials predicted better arrhythmia outcomes (HR 2.14 for paroxysmal vs. persistent, p = 0.031; and HR 1.61 for absence vs. presence of PV potentials, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The novel DFP results in reduced complication rates and procedure times, with similar success rates compared with a conventional strategy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app