We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Impact of Nonpharmacological Interventions on Pain of Knee Osteoarthritis Patients Reporting at a Tertiary Care Institution: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Indian Journal of Palliative Care 2018 October
Context: Nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) have been advocated for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). There are many gaps in the evidence to their efficacy in India.
Aims: The study aims to compare the impact of two packages of NPIs on various outcome variables of KOA patients.
Settings and Design: This was a randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care hospital.
Subjects and Methods: A study population ( n = 123) of KOA patients aged 40-65 years. Stratified block randomization was done for mild or moderate KOA into two groups. Group "A" patients received a package of NPIs including a set of supervised exercise sessions, kinesthesia, balance, and agility (KBA), meditation, weight reduction advice, and weekly telephonic reminders. Group "B" patients received the same package except for KBA & meditation. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale (VAS) and performance-based measures were measured.
Analysis: t -test and repeat measures ANOVA were undertaken.
Results: A significant intragroup reduction in WOMAC score was seen from baseline in Group A ( P = 0.00, mean difference: -9.7) as well as in Group B ( P = 0.00, -12.9). There was also significant reduction inVAS scores at the end of intervention in Group A and Group B as compared from baseline (-3.62, -3.8, P = 0.00). No intergroup difference was observed in either of the scores. VAS score reduction to 0 at different stages of intervention was noticed in 46% ( n = 57) cases. There was a significant intergroup difference for 50-Foot Walk Test ( P = 0.055, F = 3.28) at 12 months.
Conclusion: Both packages of NPIs were effective in providing relief in symptoms. No specific benefit of KBA or meditation was seen except for 50FWT.
Aims: The study aims to compare the impact of two packages of NPIs on various outcome variables of KOA patients.
Settings and Design: This was a randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care hospital.
Subjects and Methods: A study population ( n = 123) of KOA patients aged 40-65 years. Stratified block randomization was done for mild or moderate KOA into two groups. Group "A" patients received a package of NPIs including a set of supervised exercise sessions, kinesthesia, balance, and agility (KBA), meditation, weight reduction advice, and weekly telephonic reminders. Group "B" patients received the same package except for KBA & meditation. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale (VAS) and performance-based measures were measured.
Analysis: t -test and repeat measures ANOVA were undertaken.
Results: A significant intragroup reduction in WOMAC score was seen from baseline in Group A ( P = 0.00, mean difference: -9.7) as well as in Group B ( P = 0.00, -12.9). There was also significant reduction inVAS scores at the end of intervention in Group A and Group B as compared from baseline (-3.62, -3.8, P = 0.00). No intergroup difference was observed in either of the scores. VAS score reduction to 0 at different stages of intervention was noticed in 46% ( n = 57) cases. There was a significant intergroup difference for 50-Foot Walk Test ( P = 0.055, F = 3.28) at 12 months.
Conclusion: Both packages of NPIs were effective in providing relief in symptoms. No specific benefit of KBA or meditation was seen except for 50FWT.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app