Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The true clinical utility of quantitative fetal fibronectin.

Faron et al.'s dismissal of fFN in screening asymptomatic women is based on a flawed assumption that positive likelihood ratios (PLR) < 10 and negative likelihood ratios (NLR) > 0.1 are not valuable, and on evaluation of qualitative fFN only. We would argue that there is ample evidence to support its use in asymptomatic high-risk women and in threatened preterm labour when used in its quantitative form, not analysed in this meta-analysis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app