We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Comparison of Nocturnal Cough Analysis in Healthy Subjects and in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Prospective Observational Study.
BACKGROUND: Cough is a key symptom in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD).
OBJECTIVE: The study objectives were to test whether cough is related to parameters reflecting their disease severity and whether CF and PCD differ in cough frequency.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we used a microphone-based monitoring system (LEOSound® Monitor) to count the coughs in healthy subjects (HS) and in stable patients with CF and PCD (25 subjects per group) on 2 consecutive nights.
RESULTS: The median number of coughs/h in the HS, CF, and PCD groups was 0.0, 1.3, and 0.5 on the first night and 0.0, 2.3, and 0.2 on the second night, respectively. Patients with CF and PCD coughed more than HS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively) and CF patients coughed more than PCD patients (p = 0.023). A multivariable mixed model analysis revealed forced expiratory volume in 1 s as an independent risk factor for increased cough frequency in patients. The reliability for repeated measurements was higher for cough epochs/h than for coughs/h (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.75 and 0.49, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CF cough more than patients with PCD. The cough frequency in CF and PCD is associated with parameters reflecting disease severity. Cough frequency is a possible endpoint in clinical trials and cough epochs/h may be more useful than coughs/h.
OBJECTIVE: The study objectives were to test whether cough is related to parameters reflecting their disease severity and whether CF and PCD differ in cough frequency.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we used a microphone-based monitoring system (LEOSound® Monitor) to count the coughs in healthy subjects (HS) and in stable patients with CF and PCD (25 subjects per group) on 2 consecutive nights.
RESULTS: The median number of coughs/h in the HS, CF, and PCD groups was 0.0, 1.3, and 0.5 on the first night and 0.0, 2.3, and 0.2 on the second night, respectively. Patients with CF and PCD coughed more than HS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively) and CF patients coughed more than PCD patients (p = 0.023). A multivariable mixed model analysis revealed forced expiratory volume in 1 s as an independent risk factor for increased cough frequency in patients. The reliability for repeated measurements was higher for cough epochs/h than for coughs/h (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.75 and 0.49, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CF cough more than patients with PCD. The cough frequency in CF and PCD is associated with parameters reflecting disease severity. Cough frequency is a possible endpoint in clinical trials and cough epochs/h may be more useful than coughs/h.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app