We have located links that may give you full text access.
Assessment of Mass Effect Sign at High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Prediction of Cholesteatoma.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 2019 March
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of mass effect sign in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma at high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).
METHODS: This prospective study included 32 ears in 24 patients with chronic otitis media who underwent HRCT of the temporal bone. Otoscopic and operative notes were recorded. Image analysis was done both qualitatively and quantitatively. In the qualitative analysis, mass effect was evaluated visually by comparing both ears together in 4 certain anatomical sites. Ossicular erosions, erosion of tegmen tympani, erosion of tympanic segment of facial nerve canal, and the presence of lobulated nondependent opacity were also evaluated. In the quantitative analysis, we calculated the difference between the distances of the described anatomical sites in both ears.
RESULTS: Qualitative analysis of mass effect sign showed 97.1% accuracy in detecting cholesteatoma. Ossicular erosions showed 69.2% accuracy in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma. In the quantitative analysis, we found that the cutoff point of 0.45 mm in the difference of aditus measure between both ears showed 85.3% accuracy in differentiating cholesteatoma from otitis media. The cutoff point of 0.75 mm in the differences in supratubal measure showed 86.1% accuracy. The cutoff point of 0.45 mm in the medial to incus measure showed 100% accuracy.
CONCLUSION: High-resolution computed tomography is highly valuable for the detection of mass effect sign, which has great importance in diagnosing cholesteatoma.
METHODS: This prospective study included 32 ears in 24 patients with chronic otitis media who underwent HRCT of the temporal bone. Otoscopic and operative notes were recorded. Image analysis was done both qualitatively and quantitatively. In the qualitative analysis, mass effect was evaluated visually by comparing both ears together in 4 certain anatomical sites. Ossicular erosions, erosion of tegmen tympani, erosion of tympanic segment of facial nerve canal, and the presence of lobulated nondependent opacity were also evaluated. In the quantitative analysis, we calculated the difference between the distances of the described anatomical sites in both ears.
RESULTS: Qualitative analysis of mass effect sign showed 97.1% accuracy in detecting cholesteatoma. Ossicular erosions showed 69.2% accuracy in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma. In the quantitative analysis, we found that the cutoff point of 0.45 mm in the difference of aditus measure between both ears showed 85.3% accuracy in differentiating cholesteatoma from otitis media. The cutoff point of 0.75 mm in the differences in supratubal measure showed 86.1% accuracy. The cutoff point of 0.45 mm in the medial to incus measure showed 100% accuracy.
CONCLUSION: High-resolution computed tomography is highly valuable for the detection of mass effect sign, which has great importance in diagnosing cholesteatoma.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app