We have located links that may give you full text access.
Long-term outcome of JJ stent insertion for primary obstructive megaureter in children.
Journal of Pediatric Urology 2019 Februrary
BACKGROUND/AIM: Endoscopic stenting is an accepted treatment option for children with symptomatic or progressive primary obstructive megaureter (PROM). Here, long-term outcomes with endoscopic stenting are reviewed.
METHODS: Patients with PROM treated surgically over a 12-year period were identified using a prospectively maintained departmental database. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2013 and unpaired t-tests through GraphPad Software QuickCalcs.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with PROM were surgically managed in the study centre from 2005 to 2017. Twenty-nine of fifty-seven patients had the stent as the primary procedure, whereas the remainder had ureterostomy, re-implantation or nephrectomy. Six patients had bilateral PROM, giving a total of 35 renal units that were fully analysed. There was 7:1 male predominance, and 20 of 29 patients (69%) were diagnosed antenatally. The median age at stent insertion was 8 months (40 days-10 years); the median prestent ureteric diameter was 19 mm and the median pre-operative function on MAG3 was 44%. Cystoscopic stent insertion was feasible in all patients. The stent was left for a median of 183 days. In 9 of 35 (26%) renal units, the JJ stent was a successful sole long-term treatment, with median follow-up of 5 years and 8 months. The success rate was not different in children aged <1 year (8/22; 36%) in comparison to children aged >1 year (1/13; 8%), P = 0.1. The remaining 26 renal units required further surgical intervention: ureteric re-implantation in 25 and nephrectomy in one. Indications for further surgery were stent complications in 11 renal units and stent failure in 15 (Table 1). Complications related to the stent were noted in 14 renal units (41%), half being stent migration. Other complications included UTIs, stent encrustation and recurrent haematuria. There was no identifiable prestent parameter, whether clinical or radiological, that could predict which patients were likely to be successfully managed solely by stent insertion. Stent insertion was never successful as a definitive procedure when the distal ureteric diameter was >12 mm on the ultrasound after stent removal.
DISCUSSION: Success rates with primary stenting as a sole treatment for PROM was 26%, which is less than that seen in other reports (50-66%). This may be attributed to the long-term follow-up in this study, together with the strict criteria for success.
CONCLUSION: In the authors' experience, cystoscopically inserted JJ stents are of limited success as the sole treatment for PROM. In infants aged <1 year, stent insertion remains a reasonable temporising measure until the infant is old enough for a definitive procedure.
METHODS: Patients with PROM treated surgically over a 12-year period were identified using a prospectively maintained departmental database. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2013 and unpaired t-tests through GraphPad Software QuickCalcs.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with PROM were surgically managed in the study centre from 2005 to 2017. Twenty-nine of fifty-seven patients had the stent as the primary procedure, whereas the remainder had ureterostomy, re-implantation or nephrectomy. Six patients had bilateral PROM, giving a total of 35 renal units that were fully analysed. There was 7:1 male predominance, and 20 of 29 patients (69%) were diagnosed antenatally. The median age at stent insertion was 8 months (40 days-10 years); the median prestent ureteric diameter was 19 mm and the median pre-operative function on MAG3 was 44%. Cystoscopic stent insertion was feasible in all patients. The stent was left for a median of 183 days. In 9 of 35 (26%) renal units, the JJ stent was a successful sole long-term treatment, with median follow-up of 5 years and 8 months. The success rate was not different in children aged <1 year (8/22; 36%) in comparison to children aged >1 year (1/13; 8%), P = 0.1. The remaining 26 renal units required further surgical intervention: ureteric re-implantation in 25 and nephrectomy in one. Indications for further surgery were stent complications in 11 renal units and stent failure in 15 (Table 1). Complications related to the stent were noted in 14 renal units (41%), half being stent migration. Other complications included UTIs, stent encrustation and recurrent haematuria. There was no identifiable prestent parameter, whether clinical or radiological, that could predict which patients were likely to be successfully managed solely by stent insertion. Stent insertion was never successful as a definitive procedure when the distal ureteric diameter was >12 mm on the ultrasound after stent removal.
DISCUSSION: Success rates with primary stenting as a sole treatment for PROM was 26%, which is less than that seen in other reports (50-66%). This may be attributed to the long-term follow-up in this study, together with the strict criteria for success.
CONCLUSION: In the authors' experience, cystoscopically inserted JJ stents are of limited success as the sole treatment for PROM. In infants aged <1 year, stent insertion remains a reasonable temporising measure until the infant is old enough for a definitive procedure.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app