We have located links that may give you full text access.
Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2018 October 25
INTRODUCTION: Genomic profiling informs selection of matched targeted therapies as part of routine clinical care in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tissue biopsy is the gold standard; however, genomic profiling of blood-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative.
METHODS: Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling of 62 genes was performed on blood-based ctDNA from 1,552 patients with NSCLC.
RESULTS: Evidence of ctDNA was detected in 80% of samples, and of these at least one reportable genomic alteration (GA) was detected in 86% of cases. Frequently altered genes were TP53 (59%), EGFR (25%), and KRAS (17%). Comparative analysis with a tissue genomic database (n = 21,500) showed similar frequencies of GA per gene, although KRAS mutation and EGFR T790M were more frequent in tissue and ctDNA, respectively (both P <0.0001), likely reflecting use of liquid versus tissue biopsy after relapse on targeted therapy. In temporally matched ctDNA and tissue samples from 33 patients with evidence of ctDNA in the blood, 64% of GA detected in tissue were also detected in ctDNA, including 78% (58/74) of short variants and 100% (4/4) of rearrangements, but only 16% (4/25) of amplifications.
CONCLUSIONS: Genomic profiling of ctDNA detected clinically relevant GAs in a significant subset of NSCLC cases. Most alterations detected in matched tissue were also detected in ctDNA. These results suggest utility of ctDNA testing in advanced NSCLC as a complementary approach to tissue testing. Blood-based ctDNA testing may be particularly useful at the time of progression on targeted therapy.
METHODS: Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling of 62 genes was performed on blood-based ctDNA from 1,552 patients with NSCLC.
RESULTS: Evidence of ctDNA was detected in 80% of samples, and of these at least one reportable genomic alteration (GA) was detected in 86% of cases. Frequently altered genes were TP53 (59%), EGFR (25%), and KRAS (17%). Comparative analysis with a tissue genomic database (n = 21,500) showed similar frequencies of GA per gene, although KRAS mutation and EGFR T790M were more frequent in tissue and ctDNA, respectively (both P <0.0001), likely reflecting use of liquid versus tissue biopsy after relapse on targeted therapy. In temporally matched ctDNA and tissue samples from 33 patients with evidence of ctDNA in the blood, 64% of GA detected in tissue were also detected in ctDNA, including 78% (58/74) of short variants and 100% (4/4) of rearrangements, but only 16% (4/25) of amplifications.
CONCLUSIONS: Genomic profiling of ctDNA detected clinically relevant GAs in a significant subset of NSCLC cases. Most alterations detected in matched tissue were also detected in ctDNA. These results suggest utility of ctDNA testing in advanced NSCLC as a complementary approach to tissue testing. Blood-based ctDNA testing may be particularly useful at the time of progression on targeted therapy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app