We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Prospective randomized comparative study of pigtail catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration in treatment of liver abscess.
ANZ Journal of Surgery 2019 March
BACKGROUND: This prospective randomized comparative study is designed to compare outcomes of ultrasonography-guided pigtail catheter drainage (PCD) and needle aspiration for the treatment of liver abscesses in terms of days to achieve clinical improvement, 50% reduction in cavity size and duration of hospital stay.
METHODS: This is a hospital-based comparative study conducted in SMS Hospital, Jaipur, India, from May 2015 to May 2017. Sample size was calculated to be 95 subjects in each of the two groups at α error of 0.05 and power of 80%. Independent t-test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 190 patients of liver abscess were included in this study and we treated 95 patients with percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) and remaining patients with PCD along with systemic antibiotics. Mean time for clinical improvement in PNA group (6.96 ± 1.33 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (4.22 ± 1.25 days). The mean time for reduction of cavity size to 50% of original size in PNA group (7.05 ± 1.25 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (4.43 ± 1.27 days). Mean hospital stay of patients in PNA group (12.9 ± 4.02 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (11.44 ± 4.15 days).
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is a better modality as compared to PNA especially in larger abscesses which are partially liquefied.
METHODS: This is a hospital-based comparative study conducted in SMS Hospital, Jaipur, India, from May 2015 to May 2017. Sample size was calculated to be 95 subjects in each of the two groups at α error of 0.05 and power of 80%. Independent t-test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 190 patients of liver abscess were included in this study and we treated 95 patients with percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) and remaining patients with PCD along with systemic antibiotics. Mean time for clinical improvement in PNA group (6.96 ± 1.33 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (4.22 ± 1.25 days). The mean time for reduction of cavity size to 50% of original size in PNA group (7.05 ± 1.25 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (4.43 ± 1.27 days). Mean hospital stay of patients in PNA group (12.9 ± 4.02 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (11.44 ± 4.15 days).
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is a better modality as compared to PNA especially in larger abscesses which are partially liquefied.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app