Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Immunoblot reactivity at follow-up in treated patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis and healthy controls.

About 5-20% of the general population in endemic areas have seroprevalence for anti-borrelial antibodies. Previous studies have shown a high rate of 25-97% of persisting anti-borrelial antibodies in patients with treated Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) at follow-up. These studies used immunoblots with antigens from whole-cell sonicates, which could be less specific than modern recombinant antigens. We assessed the seroprevalence of anti-borrelial antibodies in serum from patients with definite LNB and healthy controls with a line immunoblot using highly specific recombinant antigens. We retrospectively identified patients with treated definite LNB who were treated at the Medical Center-University of Freiburg. Serum from LNB patients at a mean follow-up period of 4.9 years (SD: 3.3) and serum from healthy controls were assessed for anti-borrelial antibodies with a line immunoblot with recombinant antigens. A total of 45 patients with definite LNB and 40 healthy controls were included. Ten LNB patients (22.7%) had persisting antibodies (IgG and/or IgM) in serum at follow-up. Serum samples from six healthy controls (15%) were positive for anti-borrelial antibodies (IgG and or IgM). Prevalence of positive IgM or IgG antibodies showed no statistically significant difference between LNB patients at follow-up and healthy controls (IgM p = 0.32, IgG p = 0.54). Immunoblot reactivity patterns at follow-up in LNB patients did not have statistically significant differences from healthy controls. The discrepancy regarding earlier studies reporting higher amounts of LNB patients with persisting antibodies could be due to a higher specificity of the antigens used in recombinant immunoblots compared to other immunoblots (e.g., whole-cell sonicates). The results of our study should be replicated in a larger prospective multi-center study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app