We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL, PHASE II
JOURNAL ARTICLE
FDG and FMISO PET-guided dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung cancer.
Radiation Oncology 2018 October 24
BACKGROUND: Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy is the reference treatment for non-resectable locally-advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Increasing radiotherapy total dose in the whole tumour volume has been shown to be deleterious. Functional imaging with positron emission tomography (PET/CT) offers the potential to identify smaller and biologically meaningful target volumes that could be irradiated with larger doses without compromising Organs At Risk (OAR) tolerance. This study investigated four scenarios, based on 18 FDG and 18 F-miso PET/CT, to delineate the target volumes and derive radiotherapy plans delivering up to 74Gy.
METHOD: Twenty-one NSCLC patients, selected from a prospective phase II trial, had 18 FDG- and 18 F-miso PET/CT before the start of radiotherapy and 18 FDG PET/CT during the radiotherapy (42Gy). The plans were based planned on a standard plan delivering 66 Gy (plan 1) and on three different boost strategies to deliver 74Gy total dose in pre-treatment 18 FDG hotspot (70% of SUVmax ) (plan 2), pre-treatment 18 F-miso target (SUVmax > 1.4) (plan 3) and per-treatment 18 FDG residual (40% of SUVmax ). (plan 4).
RESULTS: The mean target volumes were 4.8 cc (± 1.1) for 18 FDG hotspot, 38.9 cc (± 14.5) for 18 F-miso and 36.0 cc (± 10.1) for per-treatment 18 FDG. In standard plan (66 Gy), the mean dose covering 95% of the PTV (D95%) were 66.5 (± 0.33), 66.1 (± 0.32) and 66.1 (± 0.32) Gy for 18 FDG hotspot, 18 F-miso and per-treatment 18 FDG. In scenario 2, the mean D95% was 72.5 (± 0.25) Gy in 18 FDG hotspot versus 67.9 (± 0.49) and 67.9 Gy (± 0.52) in 18 F-miso and per-treatment 18 FDG, respectively. In scenario 3, the mean D95% was 72.2 (± 0.27) Gy to 18 F-miso versus 70.4 (± 0.74) and 69.5Gy (± 0.74) for 18 FDG hotspot and per-treatment 18 FDG, respectively. In scenario 4, the mean D95% was 73.1 (± 0.3) Gy to 18 FDG per-treatment versus 71.9 (± 0.61) and 69.8 (± 0.61) Gy for 18 FDG hotspot and 18 F-miso, respectively. The dose/volume constraints to OARs were matched in all scenarios.
CONCLUSION: Escalated doses can be selectively planned in NSCLC target volumes delineated on 18 FDG and 18 F-miso PET/CT functional images. The most relevant strategy should be investigated in clinical trials.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: (RTEP5, NCT01576796 , registered 15 june 2012).
METHOD: Twenty-one NSCLC patients, selected from a prospective phase II trial, had 18 FDG- and 18 F-miso PET/CT before the start of radiotherapy and 18 FDG PET/CT during the radiotherapy (42Gy). The plans were based planned on a standard plan delivering 66 Gy (plan 1) and on three different boost strategies to deliver 74Gy total dose in pre-treatment 18 FDG hotspot (70% of SUVmax ) (plan 2), pre-treatment 18 F-miso target (SUVmax > 1.4) (plan 3) and per-treatment 18 FDG residual (40% of SUVmax ). (plan 4).
RESULTS: The mean target volumes were 4.8 cc (± 1.1) for 18 FDG hotspot, 38.9 cc (± 14.5) for 18 F-miso and 36.0 cc (± 10.1) for per-treatment 18 FDG. In standard plan (66 Gy), the mean dose covering 95% of the PTV (D95%) were 66.5 (± 0.33), 66.1 (± 0.32) and 66.1 (± 0.32) Gy for 18 FDG hotspot, 18 F-miso and per-treatment 18 FDG. In scenario 2, the mean D95% was 72.5 (± 0.25) Gy in 18 FDG hotspot versus 67.9 (± 0.49) and 67.9 Gy (± 0.52) in 18 F-miso and per-treatment 18 FDG, respectively. In scenario 3, the mean D95% was 72.2 (± 0.27) Gy to 18 F-miso versus 70.4 (± 0.74) and 69.5Gy (± 0.74) for 18 FDG hotspot and per-treatment 18 FDG, respectively. In scenario 4, the mean D95% was 73.1 (± 0.3) Gy to 18 FDG per-treatment versus 71.9 (± 0.61) and 69.8 (± 0.61) Gy for 18 FDG hotspot and 18 F-miso, respectively. The dose/volume constraints to OARs were matched in all scenarios.
CONCLUSION: Escalated doses can be selectively planned in NSCLC target volumes delineated on 18 FDG and 18 F-miso PET/CT functional images. The most relevant strategy should be investigated in clinical trials.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: (RTEP5, NCT01576796 , registered 15 june 2012).
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app