We have located links that may give you full text access.
The Influence of Lumbar Muscle Volume on Curve Progression After Skeletal Maturity in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Long-Term Follow-up Study.
Spine Deformity 2018 November
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between skeletal muscle status of the trunk and the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) during adulthood.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To date, studies evaluating the risk factors for progression of AIS have principally focused on radiographic parameters.
METHODS: Eighty-two women with AIS managed conservatively, who had a major curve ≥30° at skeletal maturity (Risser grade ≥4), were enrolled. Patients had been followed-up, on average, over 23.5 years (range, 12-37 years) after skeletal maturity, and were ≥30-years-old at the time of the survey (mean, 40.1 years). The ratio of the cross-sectional area (CSA) and signal intensity (SI) of muscles (multifidus [MF], erector spinae [ES], and psoas major [PM]) were evaluated using axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images at the level of L4.
RESULTS: The mean progression of the main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves after skeletal maturity was 8.2° (mean annual rate of 0.4°) and 7.2° (mean annual rate of 0.3°), respectively. The mean CSA ratio was as follows: MF, 23.3%; ES, 79.6%; and PM, 40.5%. The mean SI ratio was as follows: MF, 34.9%; ES, 31.7%; and PM, 20.9%. On multivariate logistic regression, a higher SI ratio of the MF was predictive of a progression of the Cobb angle and translation of the apical vertebra, with a lower CSA ratio of the ES contributing to the progression of the Cobb angle for the TL/L curve.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AIS who have a major curve ≥30° at skeletal maturity, patients with greater TL/L curve progression have lower skeletal muscle volume and higher fatty degeneration of the lumbar extensor muscles in adulthood. However, further longitudinal or prospective studies are necessary to clarify the causal relationship between scoliosis progression and trunk muscular status.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between skeletal muscle status of the trunk and the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) during adulthood.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To date, studies evaluating the risk factors for progression of AIS have principally focused on radiographic parameters.
METHODS: Eighty-two women with AIS managed conservatively, who had a major curve ≥30° at skeletal maturity (Risser grade ≥4), were enrolled. Patients had been followed-up, on average, over 23.5 years (range, 12-37 years) after skeletal maturity, and were ≥30-years-old at the time of the survey (mean, 40.1 years). The ratio of the cross-sectional area (CSA) and signal intensity (SI) of muscles (multifidus [MF], erector spinae [ES], and psoas major [PM]) were evaluated using axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images at the level of L4.
RESULTS: The mean progression of the main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves after skeletal maturity was 8.2° (mean annual rate of 0.4°) and 7.2° (mean annual rate of 0.3°), respectively. The mean CSA ratio was as follows: MF, 23.3%; ES, 79.6%; and PM, 40.5%. The mean SI ratio was as follows: MF, 34.9%; ES, 31.7%; and PM, 20.9%. On multivariate logistic regression, a higher SI ratio of the MF was predictive of a progression of the Cobb angle and translation of the apical vertebra, with a lower CSA ratio of the ES contributing to the progression of the Cobb angle for the TL/L curve.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AIS who have a major curve ≥30° at skeletal maturity, patients with greater TL/L curve progression have lower skeletal muscle volume and higher fatty degeneration of the lumbar extensor muscles in adulthood. However, further longitudinal or prospective studies are necessary to clarify the causal relationship between scoliosis progression and trunk muscular status.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app