Journal Article
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Sleep interventions for osteoarthritis and spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if sleep interventions improve pain and sleep in people with osteoarthritis and/or spinal pain compared to control/placebo.

DESIGN: Medline, Embase, AMED, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PEDro were searched from their inception date to July 2017. Keywords relating to "sleep", "osteoarthritis", "spinal pain", and "randomized controlled trial" were combined. Included RCTs investigated the use of sleep interventions for people with osteoarthritis and/or spinal pain, and measured at least one sleep and health related outcome. Meta-analyses were performed to pool mean differences for pain and sleep quality.

PROSPERO: CRD42016036315.

RESULTS: Of 1445 unique records, 24 studies were included. Sixteen studies included participants with spinal pain, seven with osteoarthritis, and one included a mixed population. Sleep interventions included established sleep interventions (cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacological interventions), and a range of others. Intervention periods ranged from four to ten weeks. Thirteen studies were of moderate to high quality (PEDro≥6/10). Due to high heterogeneity between studies we also performed sub-group and sensitivity analyses. Established sleep interventions decreased insomnia severity index for people with low back pain (pooled mean difference: -6.78/28, 95%CI: [-9.47,-4.09], I2 =40%) and osteoarthritis (-2.41, [-4.19,-0.63], 0%). However established sleep interventions decreased pain for people with low back pain (pooled mean difference: visual analogue scale -12.77/100, 95%CI: -17.57,-7.97], I2 =0%), but not osteoarthritis (-2.32, [-7.18,2.54], 27%).

CONCLUSION: Established sleep interventions appeared to improve sleep and pain for people with low back pain, and sleep for people with osteoarthritis. However more vigorous studies need to be conducted.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app