We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Observational Study
Presepsin and Procalcitonin Levels as Markers of Adverse Postoperative Complications and Mortality in Cardiac Surgery Patients.
Blood Purification 2019
UNLABELLED: Backgound: This study was aimed at evaluating the presepsin and procalcitonin levels to predict adverse postoperative complications and mortality in cardiac surgery patients.
METHODS: A total of 122 cardiac surgery patients were enrolled for the study. Presepsin and procalcitonin levels were measured 48 h after the procedure. The primary endpoints were adverse renal, respiratory, and cardiovascular outcomes and mortality.
RESULTS: Presepsin and procalcitonin levels were significantly higher in patients with adverse renal and respiratory outcome (p < 0.001 and 0.0081). The presepsin levels were significantly higher in patients with adverse cardiovascular outcome (p = 0.023) and the procalcitonin values in patients with sepsis (p = 0.0013). Presepsin levels were significantly higher in patients who died during hospitalization (382 pg/mL, interquartile range [IQR] 243-717.5 vs. 1,848 pg/mL, IQR 998-5,451.5, p = 0.049). In addition, the predictive value for in-hospital, 30-days, and 6-months mortality was higher for presepsin, with a significant difference between the 2 biomarkers (p = 0.025, p = 0.035, p = 0.003; respectively). Presepsin and procalcitonin seem to have comparable predictive value for adverse renal, cardiovascular, and respiratory outcome in cardiac surgery patients. Although a positive trend was notable for presepsin and adverse renal outcome (area under the ROC [receiver operating characteristic] curves [AUC] of 0.760, 95% CI 0.673-0.833 versus procalcitonin: AUC 0.692; 95% CI 0.601-0.773): no statistically significant difference was evident between the AUC of the 2 biomarkers (p = 0.25).
CONCLUSIONS: Presepsin and -procalcitonin seem to have comparable predictive value for -adverse renal, cardiovascular, and respiratory outcome in cardiac surgery patients. Also, presepsin possesses a better predictive value for in-hospital, 30-days, and 6-months mortality.
METHODS: A total of 122 cardiac surgery patients were enrolled for the study. Presepsin and procalcitonin levels were measured 48 h after the procedure. The primary endpoints were adverse renal, respiratory, and cardiovascular outcomes and mortality.
RESULTS: Presepsin and procalcitonin levels were significantly higher in patients with adverse renal and respiratory outcome (p < 0.001 and 0.0081). The presepsin levels were significantly higher in patients with adverse cardiovascular outcome (p = 0.023) and the procalcitonin values in patients with sepsis (p = 0.0013). Presepsin levels were significantly higher in patients who died during hospitalization (382 pg/mL, interquartile range [IQR] 243-717.5 vs. 1,848 pg/mL, IQR 998-5,451.5, p = 0.049). In addition, the predictive value for in-hospital, 30-days, and 6-months mortality was higher for presepsin, with a significant difference between the 2 biomarkers (p = 0.025, p = 0.035, p = 0.003; respectively). Presepsin and procalcitonin seem to have comparable predictive value for adverse renal, cardiovascular, and respiratory outcome in cardiac surgery patients. Although a positive trend was notable for presepsin and adverse renal outcome (area under the ROC [receiver operating characteristic] curves [AUC] of 0.760, 95% CI 0.673-0.833 versus procalcitonin: AUC 0.692; 95% CI 0.601-0.773): no statistically significant difference was evident between the AUC of the 2 biomarkers (p = 0.25).
CONCLUSIONS: Presepsin and -procalcitonin seem to have comparable predictive value for -adverse renal, cardiovascular, and respiratory outcome in cardiac surgery patients. Also, presepsin possesses a better predictive value for in-hospital, 30-days, and 6-months mortality.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app