We have located links that may give you full text access.
DA-EPOCH-R improves the outcome over that of R-CHOP regimen for DLBCL patients below 60 years, GCB phenotype, and those with high-risk IPI, but not for double expressor lymphoma.
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 2019 January
PURPOSE: This study was to compare DA-EPOCH-R and R-CHOP regimen as first-line therapy in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, retrospectively.
METHODS: A total of 252 cases treated with R-CHOP and 146 cases who received DA-EPOCH-R were enrolled into this study.
RESULTS: Overall, 162 (64.3%) and 105 patients (71.9%) achieved complete remission, 43 (17.1%) and 14 patients (9.6%) achieved partial remission following R-CHOP and DA-EPOCH-R regimen, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48 months, better progression-free survival (PFS) was seen in DA-EPOCH-R group, but no better overall survival (OS) was found in patients treated with DA-EPOCH-R compared to R-CHOP (P = 0.015 for PFS, P = 0.19 for OS). However, subgroup analysis according to cell of origin, international prognostic index (IPI), and age showed DA-EPOCH-R resulted in significantly better PFS and OS than R-CHOP regimen in patients with germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) phenotype (P = 0.002 for PFS, P = 0.007 for OS), high IPI (P = 0.002 for PFS; P = 0.03 for OS), and with a younger age (P = 0.002 for PFS, P = 0.045 for OS). We also compared two regimens in patients with double expressor lymphoma (DEL). The prognosis of DEL patients was significantly worse than non-DEL patients (P < 0.001 for PFS, P < 0.001 for OS), but DA-EPOCH-R regimen may not overcome the poor prognosis (P = 0.47 for PFS, P = 0.79 for OS).
CONCLUSION: GCB DLBCL, younger patients, and high-risk patients, but not DEL patients, may benefit from continuous-infusion DA-EPOCH-R regimen.
METHODS: A total of 252 cases treated with R-CHOP and 146 cases who received DA-EPOCH-R were enrolled into this study.
RESULTS: Overall, 162 (64.3%) and 105 patients (71.9%) achieved complete remission, 43 (17.1%) and 14 patients (9.6%) achieved partial remission following R-CHOP and DA-EPOCH-R regimen, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48 months, better progression-free survival (PFS) was seen in DA-EPOCH-R group, but no better overall survival (OS) was found in patients treated with DA-EPOCH-R compared to R-CHOP (P = 0.015 for PFS, P = 0.19 for OS). However, subgroup analysis according to cell of origin, international prognostic index (IPI), and age showed DA-EPOCH-R resulted in significantly better PFS and OS than R-CHOP regimen in patients with germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) phenotype (P = 0.002 for PFS, P = 0.007 for OS), high IPI (P = 0.002 for PFS; P = 0.03 for OS), and with a younger age (P = 0.002 for PFS, P = 0.045 for OS). We also compared two regimens in patients with double expressor lymphoma (DEL). The prognosis of DEL patients was significantly worse than non-DEL patients (P < 0.001 for PFS, P < 0.001 for OS), but DA-EPOCH-R regimen may not overcome the poor prognosis (P = 0.47 for PFS, P = 0.79 for OS).
CONCLUSION: GCB DLBCL, younger patients, and high-risk patients, but not DEL patients, may benefit from continuous-infusion DA-EPOCH-R regimen.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app